1. Veeck LL. Oocyte assessment and biological performance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988;541:259-274.PMID:
3195909.
2. Van Blerkom J. Occurrence and developmental consequences of aberrant cellular organization in meiotically mature human oocytes after exogenous ovarian hyperstimulation. J Electron Microsc Tech 1990;16:324-346.PMID:
2250186.
3. Mikkelsen AL, Lindenberg S. Morphology of in-vitro matured oocytes: impact on fertility potential and embryo quality. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1714-1718.PMID:
11473970.
4. Ebner T, Moser M, Tews G. Is oocyte morphology prognostic of embryo developmental potential after ICSI? Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:507-512.PMID:
16740226.
5. Balaban B, Urman B. Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:608-615.PMID:
16790106.
6. Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iacobelli M, Minasi MG, Romano S, Ferrero S, et al. Significance of metaphase II human oocyte morphology on ICSI outcome. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1692-1700.PMID:
18249393.
7. Rienzi L, Vajta G, Ubaldi F. Predictive value of oocyte morphology in human IVF: a systematic review of the literature. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:34-45.PMID:
20639518.
8. Veeck LL. Atlas of the human oocyte and early conceptus. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1991.
9. Bedford JM, Kim HH. Sperm/egg binding patterns and oocyte cytology in retrospective analysis of fertilization failure in vitro. Hum Reprod 1993;8:453-463.PMID:
8473467.
10. De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Qian C, Dhont M. Oocyte morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:595-597.PMID:
8671274.
11. Shi W, Xu B, Wu LM, Jin RT, Luan HB, Luo LH, et al. Oocytes with a dark zona pellucida demonstrate lower fertilization, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles. PLoS One 2014;9:e89409PMID:
24586757.
12. de Cassia S Figueira R, de Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, Semiao-Francisco L, Madaschi C, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Metaphase II human oocyte morphology: contributing factors and effects on fertilization potential and embryo developmental ability in ICSI cycles. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1115-1117.PMID:
20045105.
13. Setti AS, Figueira RC, Braga DP, Colturato SS, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Relationship between oocyte abnormal morphology and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;159:364-370.PMID:
21824710.
14. Serhal PF, Ranieri DM, Kinis A, Marchant S, Davies M, Khadum IM. Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1267-1270.PMID:
9222015.
15. Ten J, Mendiola J, Vioque J, de Juan J, Bernabeu R. Donor oocyte dysmorphisms and their influence on fertilization and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14:40-48.PMID:
17207330.
16. Sousa M, Teixeira da Silva J, Silva J, Cunha M, Viana P, Oliveira E, et al. Embryological, clinical and ultrastructural study of human oocytes presenting indented zona pellucida. Zygote 2015;23:145-157.PMID:
23992046.
17. Hassan-Ali H, Hisham-Saleh A, El-Gezeiry D, Baghdady I, Ismaeil I, Mandelbaum J. Perivitelline space granularity: a sign of human menopausal gonadotrophin overdose in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3425-3430.PMID:
9886528.
18. Verlinsky Y, Lerner S, Illkevitch N, Kuznetsov V, Kuznetsov I, Cieslak J, et al. Is there any predictive value of first polar body morphology for embryo genotype or developmental potential? Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:336-341.PMID:
14653896.
19. De Santis L, Cino I, Rabellotti E, Calzi F, Persico P, Borini A, et al. Polar body morphology and spindle imaging as predictors of oocyte quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:36-42.PMID:
16102284.
20. Bolton VN, Hawes SM, Taylor CT, Parsons JH. Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro: an analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to the blastocyst. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1989;6:30-35.
21. Kahraman S, Yakin K, Donmez E, Samli H, Bahce M, Cengiz G, et al. Relationship between granular cytoplasm of oocytes and pregnancy outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2390-2393.PMID:
11056140.
22. Esfandiari N, Burjaq H, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. Brown oocytes: implications for assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1522-1525.PMID:
16989830.
23. Wilding M, Di Matteo L, D'Andretti S, Montanaro N, Capobianco C, Dale B. An oocyte score for use in assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24:350-358.PMID:
17629723.
24. Balaban B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Yakin K, Urman B. Severe cytoplasmic abnormalities of the oocyte decrease cryosurvival and subsequent embryonic development of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1778-1785.PMID:
18477573.
25. Alikani M, Palermo G, Adler A, Bertoli M, Blake M, Cohen J. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in dysmorphic human oocytes. Zygote 1995;3:283-288.PMID:
8730892.
26. Nayudu PL, Lopata A, Jones GM, Gook DA, Bourne HM, Sheather SJ, et al. An analysis of human oocytes and follicles from stimulated cycles: oocyte morphology and associated follicular fluid characteristics. Hum Reprod 1989;4:558-567.PMID:
2794015.
27. Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Gaiswinkler U, Shebl O, Jesacher K, et al. Occurrence and developmental consequences of vacuoles throughout preimplantation development. Fertil Steril 2005;83:1635-1640.PMID:
15950630.
28. Shen Y, Stalf T, Mehnert C, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Tinneberg HR. High magnitude of light retardation by the zona pellucida is associated with conception cycles. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1596-1606.PMID:
15734754.
29. Swain JE, Pool TB. ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:431-446.PMID:
18603645.
30. Chamayou S, Ragolia C, Alecci C, Storaci G, Maglia E, Russo E, et al. Meiotic spindle presence and oocyte morphology do not predict clinical ICSI outcomes: a study of 967 transferred embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;13:661-667.PMID:
17169176.
31. Ebner T, Shebl O, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Tews G. Developmental fate of ovoid oocytes. Hum Reprod 2008;23:62-66.PMID:
17977865.
32. Balaban B, Urman B, Sertac A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R. Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3431-3433.PMID:
9886529.
33. Van Blerkom J, Henry G. Oocyte dysmorphism and aneuploidy in meiotically mature human oocytes after ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 1992;7:379-390.PMID:
1587948.
34. Wojcik C, Guerin JF, Pinatel MC, Bied V, Boulieu D, Czyba JC. Morphological and cytogenetic observations of unfertilized human oocytes and abnormal embryos obtained after ovarian stimulation with pure follicle stimulating hormone following pituitary desensitization. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2617-2622.PMID:
8567781.
35. Halvaei I, Ali Khalili M, Razi MH, Nottola SA. The effect of immature oocytes quantity on the rates of oocytes maturity and morphology, fertilization, and embryo development in ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:803-810.PMID:
22644633.
36. Van Blerkom J, Antczak M, Schrader R. The developmental potential of the human oocyte is related to the dissolved oxygen content of follicular fluid: association with vascular endothelial growth factor levels and perifollicular blood flow characteristics. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1047-1055.PMID:
9194664.