Korean J Fertil Steril Search

CLOSE


Clin Exp Reprod Med > Epub ahead of print
Govindarajan, GedelaRao, and Mantravadi: Assessment of morphometric and morphological blastocyst parameters in relation to clinical outcomes in frozen single blastocyst transfer cycles: A retrospective study

Abstract

Objective

This study compared the traditional blastocyst grading system with quantitative measurements of blastocyst expansion in relation to total pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed using data collected from patients undergoing frozen single embryo transfer cycles between 2021 and 2024. Single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers in self-patients were included, whereas cleavage-stage transfers and donor programs were excluded. All blastocysts were morphologically graded using the Gardner grading system. The degree of expansion was assessed morphometrically by measuring the inner diameter of the blastocyst from images obtained at the equatorial plane during embryo transfer, using Hamilton Thorne laser software. Multiple statistical tests were applied to analyze both qualitative and quantitative assessments of blastocysts in relation to clinical outcomes.

Results

When comparing morphological parameters such as the quality of inner cell mass (ICM), trophectoderm (TE), and blastocyst expansion level, ICM and TE quality were found to significantly influence clinical outcomes. In comparing qualitative and quantitative (mean diameter) assessments of blastocysts with clinical outcomes, TE grade and blastocyst expansion level assessed qualitatively showed significant effects, whereas ICM quality and quantitative expansion measurements did not demonstrate statistical significance.

Conclusion

Qualitative assessments of TE grade and blastocyst expansion level appear to be stronger predictors of clinical outcomes than ICM grade and morphometric assessment of blastocyst expansion. Larger datasets, including morphometric evaluation of ICM and TE cells, are recommended to clarify the predictive value of morphometric parameters.

Introduction

Since the introduction of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1978, advances in embryo selection strategies have played a pivotal role in improving clinical outcomes and reducing the incidence of multiple gestations through the implementation of single embryo transfer (SET) [1]. Traditionally, blastocyst selection has depended on static morphological assessment, particularly the Gardner and Schoolcraft grading system, which evaluates blastocyst expansion, inner cell mass (ICM), and trophectoderm (TE) quality [2]. Although widely adopted, these qualitative evaluations are inherently limited by subjectivity and interobserver variability, and they may not fully reflect the developmental potential of an embryo.
In recent years, the application of quantitative morphometric parameters has attracted increasing attention as a potentially more objective approach to embryo selection. Metrics such as ICM area and estimated TE cell count have shown strong associations with ongoing pregnancy outcomes, whereas blastocyst diameter alone has demonstrated inconsistent predictive value [3]. These findings suggest that reproducible and measurable features of blastocyst morphology may provide additional insights beyond traditional grading systems.
Moreover, conventional morphological variables—including TE and ICM grades, expansion stage, and the day of blastulation (e.g., day 5 vs. day 6 or 7)—have been independently linked to live birth rates in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles [4,5]. A recent large-scale study involving more than 10,000 FET cycles identified ICM grade as the strongest morphological predictor of both live birth and miscarriage risk [6].
Despite this evidence, relatively few studies have explored the combined predictive value of morphometric and morphological parameters, particularly in frozen single blastocyst transfer. Most previous work has either examined fresh transfers or analyzed these parameters in isolation, limiting relevance to current practice in which FETs predominate.
Therefore, this retrospective study seeks to evaluate the relationship between selected morphometric parameters—including blastocyst diameter—and clinical outcomes in frozen single blastocyst transfer cycles. By integrating these quantitative measures with conventional Gardner and Schoolcraft morphological grading, we aim to identify predictive combinations that may enhance the accuracy of embryo selection, improve SET outcomes, and advance standardization in embryology laboratories.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted with data collected from patients undergoing frozen SET cycles from 2021 to 2024. Informed consent form was obtained from all patients (Study no. 37/ECR/1312/Inst/TG/2019/RR-24). Inclusion criteria: This analysis included data from self-patients who have undergone single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers. Exclusion criteria: Cycles involving the transfer of cleavage-stage embryos, embryos genetically tested before transfer, and all cycles within a donor program (e.g., embryos derived from donor oocytes or donor embryos) were excluded. All blastocysts were morphologically graded using the Gardner grading system. Based on blastocoel expansion level and hatching status, embryos were numerically graded from level 1 to 6. ICM and TE quality were graded as A, B, or C depending on cell number and arrangement, as follows: ICM quality (grade A: many cells tightly packed; grade B: several cells loosely packed; and grade C: few cells); TE quality (grade A: many cells forming a cohesive epithelium; grade B: few cells forming a loose epithelium; and grade C: very few large cells).
In addition, the degree of expansion was assessed morphometrically by measuring the inner diameter of the blastocyst from images taken at the equatorial plane during embryo transfer (ET) using Hamilton Thorne laser software (Hamilton Thorne Inc.). Multiple statistical tests were performed to analyze both qualitative and quantitative assessments of blastocysts in relation to clinical outcomes.

1. Study population

The study included 170 FET cycles using fresh self-gametes conducted at a private fertility center from 2021 to April 2024. Patients undergoing single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer were included. Demographic data, baseline characteristics, and medical histories were obtained from medical records.

2. Ovarian stimulation

Patients were treated with either agonist (Lupride) or antagonist (Cetrotide) protocols, with an average stimulation duration of 10 to 13 days [7]. Stimulation was achieved using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (Folisurge and Foligraf) and human menopausal gonadotropins (Materna HMG). Ovarian response was monitored by transvaginal ultrasound (Voluson P6; GE Healthcare) and serum estradiol levels every second day starting on day 6 of stimulation. Gonadotropin dosage was adjusted based on ovarian response. When at least two leading follicles reached ≥18 mm in diameter, a human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger (ZyHCG) was administered, and ovum pick-up was scheduled 35 to 36 hours later. A single- or double-lumen needle was used depending on expected follicle count, and all follicles >10 mm were punctured. Follicular fluid was aspirated completely under standard aspiration pressure (100–120 mm Hg).

3. Embryo culture

Aspirated follicular fluid was screened under a stereo-zoom microscope to identify cumulus oophorus complexes (COCs). The COCs were denuded using 80 IU hyaluronidase (Hylase; Vitromed GmbH) 2 hours after oocyte retrieval. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was used as the primary insemination method. Semen was prepared using either a double-density gradient centrifugation technique (V-Grad; Vitromed GmbH) or microfluidics (ZyMōt Multi; DxNow Inc.), depending on semen parameters and prior cycle history. Mature oocytes were inseminated via ICSI within 40 hours after the hCG trigger. Following ICSI and fertilization confirmation, embryos were cultured in SAGE 1-STEP with albumin solution (Origio), placed individually in 20 μL drops under oil overlay until reaching the blastocyst stage (day 5–6). Blastocysts were graded according to Gardner and Lane criteria [8].

4. Vitrification and thawing

Graded blastocysts were vitrified using Kitazato vitrification media according to the manufacturer’s protocol and stored on cryotops (Cryotop; Kitazato BioPharma Co. Ltd.). By clinic protocol, only one blastocyst was vitrified per cryotop. However, upon patient consent, two blastocysts could be vitrified together if a double transfer was planned. On the day of ET, one top-quality blastocyst from the cycle cohort was thawed using Kitazato warming media (Kitazato BioPharma Co. Ltd.). Blastocysts showing 100% survival after vitrification and warming (within 2–3 hours) were considered suitable for transfer.

5. Embryo transfer

All patients received a hormone replacement therapy regimen with estradiol valerate (Progynova; Bayer Zydus Pharma Pvt. Ltd.). Optimal conditions for luteal support prior to transfer were defined as endometrial thickness >7 mm, serum estradiol >200 pg/mL, and serum progesterone <1.2 ng/mL. Blastocysts were re-graded at the time of ET. Expansion was also assessed morphometrically by measuring inner diameter on equatorial-plane images using Hamilton Thorne laser software. Expanded blastocysts were transferred under ultrasound guidance within 4 hours of warming. Pregnancy confirmation was performed 2 weeks after transfer using both a urine pregnancy test and serum β-hCG. Patients were followed for implantation, fetal heartbeat, and live birth, with all outcomes documented.

6. Data collection and analysis

Independent variables in the study included ICM grade, TE grade, blastocyst expansion level, and the mean diameter of the blastocyst measured at the time of ET. The outcome variables were total pregnancy rate (TPR), calculated as the number of pregnancy-positive transfers (β-hCG positive) divided by the total number of transfers performed; implantation rate (IR), defined as the number of gestational sacs observed relative to the number of embryos transferred; clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), calculated as the number of transfers with a detectable fetal heartbeat relative to the total number of transfers performed; and miscarriage rate, defined as the number of miscarriages divided by the total number of ETs performed.
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). Sample size was calculated using the PROC POWER procedure (SAS Institute Inc.). The chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis were used to determine the significance of independent variables in relation to outcome variables.

Results

A total of 170 SET cycles were performed during the study period. After excluding donor programs and pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) embryos, 157 FET cycles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed (Figure 1). The sample size was sufficient to enable robust group comparisons and to allow meaningful interpretation of the associations between blastocyst grading and reproductive outcomes. The mean female age of the study population was 32.37±4.29 years, which was similar across both the pregnancy-positive and pregnancy-negative groups. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
When comparing each morphological and morphometric parameter of the blastocyst with clinical outcomes, both ICM grade and TE grade were found to significantly influence pregnancy outcome, IR, and CPR (Table 2).
Blastocysts with Grade A ICM and TE exhibited significantly higher clinical outcomes compared with grades B and C. By contrast, blastocysts with grade C ICM or TE quality demonstrated markedly poor pregnancy outcomes. Although the mean diameter of blastocyst expansion was higher in the pregnancy-positive group (279.25±2.16 µm) compared with the negative group (132.19±2.19 µm), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Morphological assessment showed that blastocysts with level 2 expansion had the lowest clinical outcomes (TPR: 20%; IR: 0%; CPR: 0%). Expansion levels 3 (TPR: 54.2%; IR: 54.2%; CPR: 54.2%) and 4 (TPR: 52.13%; IR: 50%; CPR: 46%) demonstrated comparable outcomes, but without statistical significance. As per the laboratory’s cryopreservation protocol, only blastocysts with expansion greater than level 2 were vitrified; thus, no level 1 blastocysts were available in the post-thaw cohort. All FETs were performed 2–4 hours after thawing, following adequate re-expansion of the blastocyst. At the time of transfer, none of the blastocysts displayed hatching or TE herniation.
Overall, multivariate analysis revealed that TE grade and morphological assessment of blastocyst expansion level had significant effects on total pregnancy outcome, IR, and CPR (Table 3). None of the parameters showed significance with miscarriage rate, likely due to the limited data available.

Discussion

The success of IVF treatment is strongly influenced by the selection of high-quality embryos for uterine transfer. Advances in culture systems and laboratory techniques have increased the use of human blastocyst culture, enabling improved embryo selection for transfer. At present, blastocyst assessment primarily relies on subjective morphological evaluation. Incorporating morphological and morphometric analyses could reduce observer variability [9]. However, there remains a paucity of research on automated image analysis of human embryos [10-12], particularly at the blastocyst stage [13,14]. Automated approaches such as time-lapse monitoring and PGT-A offer potential alternatives to traditional morphology-based scoring. Yet, both approaches face technical and biological limitations, in addition to being costly. While PGT-A can provide IRs largely independent of blastocyst morphology once euploid embryos are selected, several studies indicate that morphologically high-quality blastocysts are more likely to be euploid compared to lower-quality ones [15-17]. Thus, although PGT-A offers an advanced genetic assessment that refines embryo selection, conventional morphology remains a valuable and more accessible method, particularly in centers without PGT-A facilities or for patients unable to afford such testing. The present study aimed to identify specific blastocyst characteristics predictive of clinical implantation following FET by evaluating multiple morphological and morphometric parameters, including expansion score, ICM quality, TE quality, and mean blastocyst diameter. Our findings demonstrated that higher qualitative expansion grades and superior TE quality were significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes.
The TE, a key component of the blastocyst, plays a critical role in establishing and maintaining a successful pregnancy. During the peri-implantation period following ET, TE is engaged in several essential processes for uterine receptivity and fetal development. These include hCG-mediated signaling, hatching from the zona pellucida, adhesion to and invasion of the endometrium, and modulation of the maternal immune response [18-22]. The collective importance of these TE-mediated processes highlights their central role in implantation and early embryonic development. The predictive value of TE morphology observed in this study is consistent with this understanding, supporting the idea that TE structural and functional integrity provides valuable insight into implantation potential.
Several studies have reported that blastocyst expansion is an independent predictor of live birth rates in fresh single blastocyst transfer cycles [23,24]. Du et al. [25] further demonstrated that blastocoele expansion degree may better predict live birth outcomes than ICM or TE grades, in both fresh and vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfers. Expansion is intrinsically linked to the TE, as cohesive TE cells restrict blastocyst fluid outflow while actively pumping sodium ions into the cavity. This osmotic regulation drives water influx and facilitates blastocoele expansion. Thus, a fully expanded blastocyst reflects functional TE cells, with this functionality more dependent on cellular molecular quality than on absolute cell number or arrangement. In line with these findings, although the positive group in our study had a larger mean blastocyst diameter, this metric was not statistically significant for predicting outcomes. In contrast, the morphological assessment of expansion stage significantly correlated with clinical outcomes such as pregnancy and IRs.
Although previous studies have consistently shown that ICM quality correlates with implantation potential, our study did not detect a statistically significant association between ICM grading and implantation (Table 2). This discrepancy is likely attributable to the relatively small sample size in our cohort, which limited the statistical power to detect differences [26-28].
In conclusion, our study demonstrated that in the selection of frozen blastocysts for transfer, priority should be given to morphological assessment of blastocyst expansion level and TE quality, as these parameters play a crucial role in predicting clinical success following frozen-thawed ET. Notably, blastocysts with the highest TE quality achieved pregnancy and IRs of 64.7%. The observed discrepancy between qualitative and quantitative expansion underscores the multifaceted nature of blastocyst expansion, suggesting that success is determined not solely by size, but also by intrinsic cellular functionality and dynamic developmental processes.
A key strength of this study lies in its direct comparison between traditional qualitative methods (Gardner grading) and quantitative assessment (blastocyst diameter measurement), thereby addressing the important need for more objective embryo selection criteria.
However, this study has limitations. Being retrospective in design and based on a relatively small sample size of frozen-thawed blastocysts, its findings should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, live birth outcomes can be influenced by numerous factors beyond blastocyst quality. Larger datasets and prospective studies are therefore needed to validate these findings.
The findings suggest that simple diameter measurements alone are insufficient for robust prediction of clinical outcomes. Future research should explore more advanced morphometric parameters for ICM and TE, including volume, cell number, and cellular arrangement, integrated with artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches. Such developments could support the creation and refinement of artificial intelligence-based embryo selection tools, ultimately advancing standardization and precision in IVF practice.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

A special word of gratitude to Dr. Jayashree Biswal, Associate Research Scientist, Sai Life Sciences, for her timely help, views, and assistance with manuscript writing.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: MG. Methodology: MG, KM. Formal analysis: KM. Data curation: MG. Investigation: DG. Project administration: KM. Supervision: DG, KM. Writing-original draft: KM. Writing-review & editing: DG, KM. Approval of final manuscript: MG, DG, KM.

Figure 1.
Flowchart of the study. ET, embryo transfer; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin.
cerm-2025-08452f1.jpg
Table 1.
Summary of patient characteristics and clinical history
Sr. no. Patient characteristic No. (%)
1 Female age (yr)
 22–25 6 (3.8)
 26–30 37 (23.5)
 31–35 84 (53.5)
 36–45 30 (19.1)
2 Type of infertility
 Primary 126 (80.2)
 Secondary 31 (19.7)
3 Female factors
 Advanced maternal age 5 (31.8)
 Borderline ovarian reserve 13 (8.2)
 Endometriosis 6 (3.8)
 Failed Intra-uterine inseminations (IUIs) 18 (11.4)
 Polycystic ovarian syndrome 37 (23.6)
 Poor ovarian reserve 54 (34.3)
 Tubal factor 16 (10.1)
 Unexplained 8 (5)
4 Male factors
 Anejaculation 1 (0.6)
 Normozoospermia 11 (7)
 Asthenozoospermia 6 (3.8)
 Teratozoospermia 18 (11.4)
 Astheno-teratozoospermia 81 (51.6)
 Oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia 30 (19.1)
 Azoospermia (obstructive and nonobstructive)–surgical sperm retrieval was performed 8 (5)
 Cryptozoospermia 2 (1.3)
5 No. of frozen embryo transfer cycles
 1 127 (80.8)
 2 28 (17.9)
 3 2 (1.3)
6 Blastocyst quality at the time of freezing
 Expansion
  Level 1 0
  Level 2 5 (3.1)
  Level 3 35 (22.2)
  Level 4 117 (74.5)
  Level 5 0
  Level 6 0
 Inner cell mass grade
  Grade A 80 (50.9)
  Grade B 75 (47.7)
  Grade C 2 (1.2)
 Trophectoderm grade
  Grade A 17 (10.8)
  Grade B 124 (78.9)
  Grade C 16 (10.1)
Table 2.
Comparison of each morphological and morphometric parameter with clinical outcomes
Morphological and morphometric parameters of blastocysts Total pregnancy outcome (%) p-value Implantation rate (%) p-value Clinical pregnancy rate (%) p-value
ICM grade 0.047 0.011 0.013
 Grade A (n=80) 60a) 60a) 56.9a)
 Grade B (n=75) 44a) 38.6a) 35.61a)
 Grade C (n=02) 0a) 0a) 0a)
Trophectoderm grade 0.015 0.043 0.047
 Grade A (n=17) 64.7a) 64.7a) 58.8a)
 Grade B (n=124) 54a) 50.8a) 47.9a)
 Grade C (n=16) 18.7a) 18.7a) 18.75a)
Expansion 0.347 0.073 0.073
 Level 2 (n=5) 20 0 0
 Level 3 (n=35) 54.2 54.2 54.2
 Level 4 (n=117) 52.13 50 46
Mean diameter of blastocyst expansion (µm) 279.25±2.16 0.560 286.75±2.1 0.589 299.38±2.15 0.611
132.19±2.19 132.32±2.23 132.18±2.23

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Chi-square analysis was performed to compare morphological and morphometric parameters with clinical outcomes.

ICM, inner cell mass.

a)p<0.05.

Table 3.
Regression analysis of morphological and morphometric parameter with the clinical outcome.
Blastocyst quality p-value
Total pregnancy outcome Implantation rate Clinical pregnancy rate Miscarriage rate
ICM gradea) 0.495 0.3461 0.5886 0.5474
TE gradea) 0.0122b) 0.0120b) 0.0265b) 0.9554
Level of expansiona) 0.0193b) 0.0035b) 0.0039b) -
Diameter of Expansiona) 0.5606 0.5893 0.6116 0.4306

ICM, inner cell mass; TE, trophectoderm.

a)Logistic regression analysis was performed using ICM grade, TE grade, morphological blastocyst expansion level, and diameter of blastocyst expansion as independent variables, with pregnancy outcome, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate as dependent variables;

b)p<0.05.

References

1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978;2:366.
crossref
2. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999. Parthenon Press; 1999. p. 378-88.

3. Sciorio R, Greco PF, Tramontano L, Gullo G, Greco E. Morphometric blastocyst assessment: a retrospective study examining the relationship between blastocyst diameter and area and pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproduction technology cycles. J Clin Med 2025;14:2827.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Jiang Y, Jiang R, He H, Ren X, Yu Q, Jin L. Comparison of clinical outcomes for different morphological scores of D5 and D6 blastocysts in the frozen-thawed cycle. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023;23:97.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Ferreux L, Bourdon M, Sallem A, Santulli P, Barraud-Lange V, Le Foll N, et al. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Hum Reprod 2018;33:390-8.
crossref pmid
6. Ai J, Jin L, Zheng Y, Yang P, Huang B, Dong X. The morphology of inner cell mass is the strongest predictor of live birth after a frozen-thawed single embryo transfer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:621221.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Lai Q, Zhang H, Zhu G, Li Y, Jin L, He L, et al. Comparison of the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocol on the same patients in assisted reproduction during controlled ovarian stimulation cycles. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013;6:1903-10.
pmid pmc
8. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1155-8.
crossref pmid
9. Baxter Bendus AE, Mayer JF, Shipley SK, Catherino WH. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in day 3 embryo grading. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1608-15.
crossref pmid
10. Kirkegaard K, Hindkjaer JJ, Grondahl ML, Kesmodel US, Ingerslev HJ. A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:565-72.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Cruz M, Gadea B, Garrido N, Pedersen KS, Martinez M, Perez-Cano I, et al. Embryo quality, blastocyst and ongoing pregnancy rates in oocyte donation patients whose embryos were monitored by time-lapse imaging. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28:569-73.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
12. Ziebe S. Morphometric analysis of human embryos to predict developmental competence. Reprod Fertil Dev 2013;26:55-64.
crossref pmid pdf
13. Santos Filho E, Noble JA, Poli M, Griffiths T, Emerson G, Wells D. A method for semi-automatic grading of human blastocyst microscope images. Hum Reprod 2012;27:2641-8.
crossref pmid
14. Filho ES, Noble JA, Wells D. A review on automatic analysis of human embryo microscope images. Open Biomed Eng J 2010;4:170-7.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
15. Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod 2016;31:2245-54.
crossref pmid
16. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Wells D. Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. Mol Hum Reprod 2014;20:117-26.
crossref pmid
17. Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1173-81.
crossref pmid
18. Licht P, Russu V, Lehmeyer S, Wildt L. Molecular aspects of direct LH/hCG effects on human endometrium: lessons from intrauterine microdialysis in the human female in vivo. Reprod Biol 2001;1:10-9.
pmid
19. Jones GM, Cram DS, Song B, Kokkali G, Pantos K, Trounson AO. Novel strategy with potential to identify developmentally competent IVF blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1748-59.
crossref pmid
20. Tsampalas M, Gridelet V, Berndt S, Foidart JM, Geenen V, Perrier d'Hauterive S. Human chorionic gonadotropin: a hormone with immunological and angiogenic properties. J Reprod Immunol 2010;85:93-8.
crossref pmid
21. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril 2011;95:520-4.
crossref pmid
22. Parks JC, McCallie BR, Janesch AM, Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Blastocyst gene expression correlates with implantation potential. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1367-72.
crossref pmid
23. Ahlstrom A, Westin C, Reismer E, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 2011;26:3289-96.
crossref pmid
24. Thompson SM, Onwubalili N, Brown K, Jindal SK, McGovern PG. Blastocyst expansion score and trophectoderm morphology strongly predict successful clinical pregnancy and live birth following elective single embryo blastocyst transfer (eSET): a national study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:1577-81.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
25. Du QY, Wang EY, Huang Y, Guo XY, Xiong YJ, Yu YP, et al. Blastocoele expansion degree predicts live birth after single blastocyst transfer for fresh and vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2016;105:910-9.
crossref pmid
26. Nazem TG, Sekhon L, Lee JA, et al. The correlation between morphology and implantation of euploid human blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 2019;38:169-76.
crossref pmid
27. Sivanantham S, Saravanan M, Sharma N, Shrinivasan J, Raja R. Morphology of inner cell mass: a better predictive biomarker of blastocyst viability. PeerJ 2022;10:e13935.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
28. Shi D, Xu J, Zhang M, Niu W, Shi H, Yao G, et al. Association between the quality of inner cell mass and first trimester miscarriage after single blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2020;18:43.
crossref pmid pmc pdf


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
82 Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea
Tel: +82-31-787-7254    CP: +82-10-9072-3154    E-mail: blasto@snubh.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next