Korean J Fertil Steril Search

CLOSE


Clin Exp Reprod Med > Epub ahead of print
Kelley, Thomas, and Gardner: Replacement of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) holding pipette with a microfabricated device (microICSI) reduces changes to oocyte shape during sham injection of human oocytes

Abstract

Objective

Previous studies indicate that intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) holding pipettes can be replaced by a three-dimensional printed device (microICSI) that supports oocytes during injection. Use of microICSI reduced the size of the injection funnel in porcine oocytes, suggesting less trauma and resulting in increased blastocyst rates. This study measured changes in oocyte shape using donated human oocytes matured overnight.

Methods

Donated human oocytes not suitable for clinical use and matured in vitro overnight were subjected to sham ICSI using conventional methods (cICSI, n=39) or microICSI (n=38). Procedures were video recorded, and oocyte shape during injection was measured.

Results

Immediately before injection, the area, perimeter, and x-axis diameter of cICSI oocytes were larger than those of microICSI oocytes, and cICSI oocytes were less circular and round, indicating that the holding pipette distorted oocyte shape. Mid-injection, cICSI oocytes showed greater changes in x-axis and y-axis diameter than microICSI oocytes relative to pre-injection shape, and they were less round. There was no difference in injection funnel depth. Post-injection, microICSI oocytes showed a greater decrease in x-axis diameter and area compared to pre-injection shape than cICSI oocytes. There was no difference in the rate of lysis or degeneration after injection. Needle set-up time was faster with microICSI, but the time required to move oocytes in and out of the device was slower. Total procedure time was unchanged.

Conclusion

The microICSI device reduced distortion in oocyte shape caused by the holding pipette before and during injection, although it did not reduce injection funnel size or overall procedure time.

Introduction

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was introduced into human in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1992 and has been used for 30 years with relatively little advancement in technology [1,2]. To perform ICSI, a denuded oocyte is immobilized using a glass holding pipette with suction, while an immobilized sperm is injected using an injection needle. The injection needle applies considerable point pressure as it penetrates the zona pellucida, inducing conformational changes in oocyte shape [3-5]. Once through the zona, the needle must then penetrate the oolemma, again applying substantial pressure on the oocyte and its cytoskeleton. Because the oocyte is held in place by the holding pipette, it becomes distorted into a toroidal shape (appearing oblong in two-dimensional view (2D) as the cytoplasm is invaginated. This invagination, called the injection funnel, can extend to more than two-thirds of the oocyte diameter before the oolemma finally gives way and the needle enters. The physical trauma of ICSI is clearly observable under the microscope, and intracellular strain is greatest at the oocyte center [6]. Importantly, the degree of distortion has been correlated with altered embryo development and gene expression [5,7,8]. It is accepted that ICSI results in lysis of some of the injected oocytes; the Vienna Consensus on key performance indicators recommends up to a 10% degeneration rate in a competent IVF laboratory [9]. The lysis rate is influenced by oocyte fragility, oolemma rigidity, patient age, and the embryologist’s experience and technique [10-13].
Using 2-photon polymerization three-dimensional (3D) printing, it has become possible to fabricate sub-micron-resolution devices for IVF applications [14]. The polymers used for these devices are safe for gametes and embryos, as confirmed in mouse embryo culture using an earlier prototype that yielded fertilization and blastocyst rates equivalent to standard microdrop culture [15]. One such device, microICSI, was designed to reduce stress on the oocyte during ICSI [15,16]. Instead of a glass holding pipette and suction, a clear 3D-printed receptacle for the oocyte is integrated onto a polystyrene dish, which does not require suction to hold the oocyte. Using a cup-shaped receptacle rather than a pipette and eliminating the use of suction may therefore reduce trauma to the oocyte [15,17]. In porcine oocytes, microICSI produced higher blastocyst rates than conventional ICSI (cICSI) while maintaining equivalent fertilization rates and blastocyst cell numbers [16]. These animal studies indicate the device is safe and may support improved embryo development even without increased fertilization rates. Recently, McLennan et al. [16] performed repeated sham injections on 18 donated frozen human oocytes and observed only one case of lysis, suggesting that microICSI may be suitable for human IVF.
microICSI also reduces the complexity and difficulty of ICSI by removing the need for a second micromanipulator, thereby shortening the procedure and decreasing the number of hand movements [16]. This simplified approach could reduce ICSI duration, minimize variability in fertilization rates among embryologists, and shorten training time. Such improvements may help alleviate workload burden, as embryologists currently manage high caseloads and experience injuries and burnout [18-20].
The aim of this study was to perform sham ICSI without sperm on donated fresh human oocytes not suitable for clinical use and to measure procedure duration and any changes in oocyte shape during injection. 

Methods

1. microICSI devices

microICSI devices were supplied by Fertilis and were manufactured as previously described [16].

2. Oocytes

Ethical approval was obtained from the Melbourne IVF Human Ethics Committee (98-22-MIVF). Oocytes from all patients undergoing ICSI or oocyte freezing at Melbourne IVF who had consented to donate oocytes unsuitable for clinical use to research were eligible for inclusion. Oocytes that were immature at the time of ICSI or oocyte freezing (germinal vesicle or metaphase I) for up to 6 hours after collection were deemed unsuitable for clinical use and were cultured overnight under 6% CO₂ and 5% O₂ in Gx-IVF PLUS (Vitrolife AB). Oocytes that matured overnight (metaphase II) and were morphologically normal were included in this study.

3. microICSI

microICSI dishes were prepared with a 30 µL drop of Gx-MOPS (Vitrolife AB) placed over the microwells next to an elongated 24 µL drop of Gx-MOPS, both overlaid with 4.5 mL OVOIL (Vitrolife). cICSI dishes (Vitrolife) were prepared with six drops of 12 µL Gx-MOPS and an elongated 24 µL drop of Gx-MOPS, similarly overlaid with 4.5 mL OVOIL. All dishes were warmed to 37 °C. Oocytes were randomized to either cICSI or microICSI, and where possible, sibling oocytes were split between groups. Sham ICSI injections without sperm were performed on an Eclipse Ti-S microscope (Nikon) equipped with a heated stage and a TrueChrome II camera (Tucsen Photonics) using RI Viewer imaging software (CooperSurgical). Micromanipulations were carried out using the TransferMan NK2 (Eppendorf). Holding pipettes had a 25 μm internal diameter with a 30° tip angle (ICSION), and injection needles were non-spiked with a 4.0 μm internal diameter and 30° tip angle (ICSION). Videos of all sham ICSI procedures were recorded, and the time required to complete each procedure was documented. Following sham ICSI, oocytes were transferred to a pre-equilibrated EmbryoScope slide (Vitrolife) containing GxTL culture medium (Vitrolife), overlaid with OVOIL, and incubated overnight in an EmbryoScope or EmbryoScope+ time-lapse incubator at 37 °C, 5% O₂, and 6% CO₂ to assess lysis.
To compare oocyte size and shape before injection, a separate experiment was conducted in which the same oocyte was positioned in the well of the microICSI dish (where oocytes retain their natural shape), within the microICSI hemisphere, and on the cICSI holding pipette. These oocytes were not injected.

4. Image analysis

ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) 1.54g was used to assess changes in oocyte shape from still images extracted from ICSI videos [21]. Oocyte area, perimeter, diameter, roundness (smoothness), and circularity were measured at three time points: pre-injection immediately before needle penetration, mid-injection immediately before the oolemma broke, and post-injection immediately after needle withdrawal (Figure 1). The x-axis refers to the diameter across the oocyte center parallel to the injection needle, and the y-axis refers to the diameter across the center perpendicular to the needle. Circularity was calculated as (4π×area/perimeter²), and roundness as (4×area/[π×major_axis²]). The area, width, depth, and angle of the injection funnel were measured at mid-injection and post-injection. Images were not captured in other planes, and no 3D measurements were performed.

5. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism v.10 (GraphPad Software Inc.). Categorical variables were analyzed using a Chi-squared test. Normality was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. For continuous variables with two groups, normally distributed data were compared using a two-tailed unpaired t-test, whereas non-normally distributed data were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney test. For variables with more than two groups, normally distributed data were compared using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, and non-normally distributed data were analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.

Results

No differences were observed in patient demographics between the microICSI and cICSI groups (Supplementary Table 1) or in the maturity of oocytes at the time they were discarded from clinical use (Supplementary Table 2).

1. Oocyte shape

1) Pre-injection

The average area and perimeter of oocytes immediately before needle penetration were greater in the cICSI group than in the microICSI group (Table 1). The diameter along the x-axis was also larger in the cICSI group, whereas the y-axis diameter did not differ, resulting in greater circularity in the microICSI group. In addition, oocytes in the microICSI group were more round (i.e., smoother) prior to injection. Together, these findings indicate distortion of oocyte shape caused by suction from the holding pipette, which can elongate oocytes along the x-axis. Zona thickness did not differ between groups.

2) Mid-injection

During mid-injection, oocytes in the cICSI group demonstrated a greater decrease in their x-axis diameter relative to their pre-injection shape compared with oocytes in the microICSI group (Table 2). cICSI oocytes also exhibited a greater increase in y-axis diameter from pre-injection measurements than microICSI oocytes. These results suggest that microICSI caused less compression along the x-axis and less elongation along the y-axis during injection.
Both groups became less circular and less round during injection, although the decrease in roundness was slightly smaller in the microICSI group, and microICSI oocytes were more round during injection than cICSI oocytes. This may be caused by continued distortion produced by pipette suction in the cICSI group, or possibly due to support provided by the cup-shaped hemisphere in the microICSI device.
Both microICSI and cICSI oocytes showed decreased area and increased perimeter compared with pre-injection shape, with no differences between groups. The depth, width, and area of the injection funnel generated during injection were also not different between the two methods (Table 3).

3) Post-injection

Immediately after withdrawal of the needle, oocytes in both groups showed a shorter x-axis diameter than their pre-injection shape; however, the microICSI group exhibited a greater decrease in x-axis diameter than the cICSI group (Table 4). Both groups also displayed a reduction in area compared with pre-injection, with a larger decrease observed in the microICSI group. This may indicate that microICSI oocytes experienced a slower return to their pre-injection shape.
The perimeter of oocytes in both groups increased slightly from pre-injection, likely reflecting the presence of a residual injection funnel. There was no difference in the number of oocytes exhibiting a residual funnel immediately after needle withdrawal (Table 5), and the depth, width, and area of residual funnels did not differ between microICSI and cICSI.
Oocytes in both groups were slightly less circular post-injection compared to their pre-injection shape. Interestingly, roundness increased slightly in cICSI oocytes but decreased slightly in microICSI oocytes. Because cICSI oocytes were less round initially, the post-injection roundness did not differ significantly between methods.
There was no significant difference in the rate of lysis or degeneration following injection. One oocyte lysed immediately after microICSI due to excessive pressure during removal from the hemisphere. Two additional oocytes degenerated during culture at 0.9 hour post-injection (hpi) and 4.5 hpi; one was due to incorrect focal plane selection during injection, and the other to loss of micromanipulator control. The micromanipulator incident was unrelated to microICSI and could also have occurred during cICSI. The other two cases occured when the operator was relatively inexperienced with the device, and such events would be unlikely after further training. In the cICSI group, one oocyte degenerated at 5.5 hpi for unknown reasons, although no resistance was noted during injection.
When oocyte shape was measured again from the first image captured by the EmbryoScope+ within 30 minutes post-injection, no differences were detected between groups in area (10,229±106 µm² vs. 10,115±87 µm²), perimeter (360±1.8 µm vs. 358±1.5 µm), diameter (117±0.7 µm vs. 116±0.5 µm), circularity (0.991±0.001 vs. 0.990±0.004), or roundness (0.954±0.006 vs. 0.960±0.004).

4) Effect of the hemisphere and holding pipette on oocyte shape

A separate cohort was used to compare the shape of the same oocyte in the microICSI well (representing its natural shape), in the microICSI hemisphere, and on the cICSI holding pipette. No significant differences were detected in oocyte area, perimeter, or zona thickness among the three positions (Supplementary Table 3). However, oocytes were significantly less round compared to their natural shape when positioned on the holding pipette or in the hemisphere, although circularity remained unchanged. This corresponded to an increase in the longest diameter (major axis) when oocytes were placed on the holding pipette and a trend toward a decrease in the shortest diameter (minor axis) when positioned in the microICSI hemisphere (p=0.0507). These findings indicate that some distortion occurred in both the pipette and hemisphere compared with the natural shape, although the type and degree of deformation differed.

2. Procedure duration

The time taken to prepare the dishes was a few seconds slower for microICSI (Table 6). In all but one replicate, one dish was created for each method. Microscope set-up time was twice as fast for microICSI because no holding pipette was required. In contrast, the time needed to load and retrieve oocytes was slower for microICSI because oocytes were added to and removed from microwells individually for traceability.
Two methods were used for the microICSI procedure: aligning all oocytes at the beginning of the procedure or aligning each oocyte immediately before injection. When oocytes were aligned first, the time per injection was shorter in the microICSI group, but overall procedure duration did not differ (Table 7). When oocytes were aligned at the time of injection, neither the time required for each injection nor the total time to complete the procedure differed between microICSI and cICSI.

Discussion

This study found that the microICSI device was an effective replacement for the holding pipette for ICSI with human oocytes. The rate of degeneration following injection was low and comparable to cICSI. In addition, oocyte shape was better preserved before and during injection when the microICSI device was used instead of a traditional holding pipette.
Maintaining oocyte shape is considered beneficial because it indicates lower mechanical stress and preservation of cytoskeletal structure. Deformation of oocytes can damage the spindle in mouse oocytes, which may lead to errors in chromosome segregation and subsequent aneuploidies [22,23]. ICSI involves the application of physical stress during sperm injection, and oocyte shape is often visibly distorted. Performing a sham ICSI procedure on IVF-inseminated mouse oocytes resulted in slower blastocyst development than in oocytes not subjected to sham ICSI, suggesting that the mechanical act of injection alone can alter developmental kinetics and reduce viability [24]. Furthermore, clinical ICSI procedures that require greater manipulation—and therefore more extensive cytoskeletal disruption—such as aspirating large volumes of cytoplasm or performing multiple injections, have been associated with lower fertilization rates and poorer embryo development [13,25,26]. Several recent studies have shown that ICSI techniques that produce less mechanical distortion, such as Piezo ICSI and laser-assisted ICSI, result in lower degeneration rates and improved fertilization and embryo development [27-30]. Conversely, Iwayama and Yamashita [5] reported no correlation between the degree of oocyte elongation or contraction during ICSI and fertilization or blastocyst development, although their study involved Piezo ICSI, which naturally causes less distortion than cICSI. There is a lack of published data regarding the significance of the return to circular shape after ICSI. In the current study, oocytes in the microICSI group showed a greater immediate post-injection decrease in size and x-axis diameter relative to their pre-injection shape, suggesting they returned to baseline shape more slowly than cICSI oocytes. However, after 30 minutes, no differences in shape remained between the two groups. The significance of this observation is unknown, and it is unclear whether a faster return to baseline indicates a more viable oocyte or instead reflects a compromised cytoskeletal structure. Further work is needed to determine whether the reduced distortion afforded by microICSI improves blastocyst outcomes, as has been observed in animal studies [16].
An earlier version of the microICSI device was found to reduce injection funnel depth compared with cICSI in mouse and porcine oocytes [17,31]. In the current study, however, the size of the injection funnel during injection did not differ between microICSI and cICSI, which is consistent with previous work in porcine oocytes using a later version of the device [16]. Injection funnel size has been correlated with developmental outcomes: large funnels caused by high oolemma resistance have been associated with higher degeneration rates and poorer embryo development [5,32,33]; however, very small funnels caused by low oolemma resistance have also been linked to higher degeneration rates, reduced fertilization, and lower blastocyst development [10,12,13,34-36]. These adverse outcomes in oocytes with either very large or very small funnels due to abnormal oolemma resistance are likely attributable to underlying oocyte quality [37,38] rather than the ICSI technique itself. Therefore, the significance of injection funnel size when comparing different methodologies remains uncertain and warrants further investigation in future studies of ICSI techniques.
No difference was observed between cICSI and microICSI in either the presence or size of a residual injection funnel immediately after injection. As with injection funnel size, any variation in residual funnel characteristics may be attributable to oocyte quality, ICSI technique, or a combination of these factors. Modifications to ICSI technique, including the type of injection pipette used, can influence the formation of residual funnels after cICSI; for example, larger injection funnels have been associated with higher fertilization rates [39]. Persistence of a funnel at 2 minutes has also been linked to lower degeneration rates and higher embryo quality [40]. Conversely, blastocysts derived from oocytes without a persistent funnel were associated with higher pregnancy rates [40], and a recent study found no relationship between residual funnels and fertilization or embryo development outcomes [32]. As with funnel size, the connection between residual funnels and oocyte viability remains unresolved and warrants further evaluation.
The time required to perform ICSI with the microICSI device was largely consistent with the findings of McLennan et al. [16]. Because the holding pipette was replaced by the microICSI dish, microscope and needle set-up was faster than cICSI. However, loading and unloading oocytes into the microICSI dish took longer, as each oocyte needed to be placed into and removed from the microwells with care. As a result, device design has since been modified to widen the well and hemisphere openings to facilitate faster loading and removal, meaning this aspect may improve in future studies. In contrast to McLennan et al. [16], who reported faster injection times with microICSI, injection time in this study was comparable to cICSI. Preparation of the microICSI dish was also slightly slower than cICSI. Overall, the total procedure time for microICSI was similar to that of cICSI. Because this was a research study using discarded oocytes, future work should determine whether microICSI provides workflow advantages or time savings in routine clinical IVF.
A limitation of this study is the use of sham injections with late-maturing oocytes, as it is unclear how maturation in vitro without an in vitro maturation culture system affects the oolemma. Oolemma membrane tension changes as oocytes mature [41,42], and post-ovulatory aging of mouse oocytes has been shown to decrease membrane tension [43]. Oocyte distortion during injection may also be influenced by factors not controlled in this study, such as injection speed and force [3] and patient-related characteristics, including age [44,45]. In addition, measurements of oocyte shape were based on 2D images captured in a single plane, whereas oocytes are 3D spherical structures.
Future studies should investigate the use of the microICSI device in clinical human IVF to determine whether the reduction in oocyte distortion observed here also occurs with in vivo-matured oocytes. Clinical research should assess whether the improvements seen in this study translate into higher blastocyst rates, as reported in animal models [16], or perhaps reductions in aneuploidy due to decreased spindle disruption. The microICSI device could also be combined with other techniques that reduce oocyte stress, such as Piezo ICSI, and future studies should examine whether combined approaches provide additive benefits compared with each method alone.

Conflict of interest

David K. Gardner is a co-founder and shareholder in Fertilis. Rebecca L. Kelley, Cody Thomas, and David K. Gardner are employees of Virtus Health, which is a shareholder in Fertilis.

Acknowledgments

Fertilis supplied the microICSI devices, along with training and product support. We express gratitude to Professor Jeremy Thompson for contributions to the manuscript and to Dr. Kathryn Gurner and Dr. Alexandra Harvey for assistance with the study and comments on the manuscript.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: RLK, DKG. Methodology: RLK, CT, DKG. Formal analysis: RLK. Data curation: RLK. Investigation: RLK, CT. Supervision: DKG. Writing-original draft: RLK. Writing-review & editing: RLK, CT, DKG. Approval of final manuscript: RLK, CT, DKG.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material can be found via https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2025.08144.
Supplementary Table 1.
Oocyte source and patient demographics
cerm-2025-08144-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf
Supplementary Table 2.
Oocyte maturity at the time of discard from clinical use
cerm-2025-08144-Supplementary-Table-2.pdf
Supplementary Table 3.
Repeated measurements of the same oocyte in cICSI and microICSI
cerm-2025-08144-Supplementary-Table-3.pdf

Figure 1.
Measurements of oocyte shape and injection funnel during microICSI. Changes in oocyte shape were measured from still images taken at three timepoints from video recorded during microICSI. (A) Pre-injection, immediately before penetration of the needle. Example measurements of oocyte area, perimeter, roundness, and circularity are shown. (B) Pre-injection, immediately before penetration of the needle. Example measurements of the x-axis and y-axis diameters. (C) Mid-injection, immediately before the breaking of the oolemma membrane. Example measurement of the injection funnel area. (D) Post-injection, immediately after withdrawal of the needle. Example measurement of residual funnel width and depth. Images from conventional ICSI were measured using the same methods (not shown). ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
cerm-2025-08144f1.jpg
Table 1.
Pre-injection oocyte shape
cICSI (n=39) microICSI (n=37) p-value
Area (µm2) 9,954±94 9,702±80 <0.05
Perimeter (µm) 356.1±1.7 350.8±1.5 <0.05
y-axis (µm) 106.9±0.7 107.3±0.7 NS
x-axis (µm) 116.3±0.7 111.9±0.5 <0.0001
Zona thickness (µm) 18.4±0.5 17.9±0.6 NS
Circularity 0.986±0.001 0.990±0.001 <0.001
Roundness 0.925±0.006 0.950±0.005 <0.001

Values are presented as mean±standard error of the mean. Measured from video still images when the oocyte was on the holding pipette or in a hemisphere immediately before sham ICSI.

cICSI, conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NS, not significant.

Table 2.
Mid-injection oocyte shape
cICSI (n=39) microICSI (n=35) p-value
Area (µm2) 7,727±135 7,358±104 <0.05
 Change from pre-injection (µm2) –2,227±114 –2,318±109 NS
 Change from pre-injection (%) –22.4±1.1 –23.9±1.1 NS
Perimeter (µm) 367.3±2.6 358.5±2.3 <0.05
 Change from pre-injection (µm) 11.2±2.2 8.1±1.5 NS
 Change from pre-injection (%) 3.2±0.6 2.3±0.4 NS
y-axis (µm) 122.3±1.3 117.6±0.9 <0.01
 Change from pre-injection (µm) 15.3±1.1 10.4±0.7 <0.001
 Change from pre-injection (%) 14.3±1.0 9.7±0.7 <0.001
x-axis (µm) 54.8±2.9 58.9±1.9 NS
 Change from pre-injection (µm) –61.5±2.8 –53.0±1.9 <0.05
 Change from pre-injection (%) –52.9±2.4 –47.3±1.7 0.056
Circularity 0.725±0.017 0.726±0.014 NS
 Change from pre-injection –0.26±0.02 –0.26±0.01 NS
Roundness 0.589±0.020 0.641±0.010 <0.05
 Change from pre-injection –0.34±0.02 –0.31±0.01 <0.05

Values are presented as mean±standard error of the mean. Measured from video still images during sham ICSI, the last frame before oolemma membrane breaking.

cICSI, conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NS, not significant.

Table 3.
Injection funnel mid-injection
cICSI (n=39) microICSI (n=37) p-value
Injection funnel area (µm2) 986±67 1,075±63 NS
Injection funnel depth (µm) 27.2±1.6 29.1±1.3 NS
Injection funnel width (µm) 70.4±1.6 69.6±1.2 NS
Injection funnel angle at the needle point (°) 110.8±3.1 107.8±2.9 NS

Values are presented as mean±standard error of the mean.

Measured from video still images during sham ICSI, the last frame before oolemma membrane breaking.

cICSI, conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NS, not significant.

Table 4.
Post-injection oocyte shape
cICSI (n=39) microICSI (n=37) p-value
Area (µm2) 9,837±105 9,463±98 <0.05
 Change from pre-injection (µm2) –117±29 –239±47 NS
 Change from pre-injection (%) –1.2±0.3 –2.5±0.5 <0.05
Perimeter (µm) 374.0±3.7 365.8±3.3 NS
 Change from pre-injection (µm) 17.9±3.4 14.9±3.0 NS
 Change from pre-injection (%) 5.0±1.0 4.3±0.9 NS
y-axis (µm) 107.4±0.7 108.3±0.8 NS
 Change from pre-injection (µm) 0.5±0.2 1.0±0.3 NS
 Change from pre-injection (%) 0.4±0.2 0.9±0.3 NS
x-axis (µm) 114.2±0.9 107.8±1.0 <0.0001
 Change from pre-injection (µm) –2.1±0.6 –4.1±0.8 <0.05
 Change from pre-injection (%) –1.8±0.5 –3.7±0.7 <0.05
Circularity 0.891±0.016 0.895±0.016 NS
 Change from pre-injection –0.09±0.02 –0.09±0.02 NS
Roundness 0.937±0.006 0.931±0.007 NS
 Change from pre-injection 0.012±0.004 –0.020±0.008 <0.01

Values are presented as mean±standard error of the mean.

Measured from video still images during sham ICSI, the first frame after the withdrawal of the needle from the oocyte.

cICSI, conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NS, not significant.

Table 5.
Residual injection funnel post-injection
cICSI (n=39) microICSI (n=37) p-value
Presence of residual injection funnel (%) 23 (59.0) 23 (62.0) NS
Injection funnel area (µm2) 120±14 170±27 NS
Injection funnel depth (µm) 22±2.0 21.2±2.0 NS
Injection funnel width (µm) 15.6±1.8 19.4±2.5 NS

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard error of the mean.

Measured from video still images during sham ICSI, the first frame after the withdrawal of the needle from the oocyte.

cICSI, conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NS, not significant.

Table 6.
Procedure time
cICSI (n=12) microICSI (n=12) p-value
Dish set-up time (sec) 61.1±4.6 68.3±2.0 <0.05
Needle set-up time (sec) 123.5±6.11 66.7±2.2 <0.001
Average number of oocytes per replicate 3.3±0.5 3.3±0.6 NS
Oocytes into dish (sec) 30.7±4.9 52.4±9.1 <0.05
Oocytes out of dish (sec) 49.1±7.8 98.1±18.3 0.0534
Total procedure time (sec) 554.8±60.4 605.3±74.2 NS

Values are presented as mean±standard error of the mean.

Total procedure time included dish preparation, moving oocytes and sham ICSI injection.

One replicate required two dishes for cICSI due to oocyte number.

One replicate was excluded due to recording issues.

cICSI, conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NS, not significant.

Table 7.
Injection time
cICSI microICSI p-value
Oocytes aligned before starting
 Total oocytes (n) 27 27
 Oocytes per replicate (n) 3.8±0.8 3.9±0.8 NS
 Injection time per oocyte (sec) 67.2±2.8 51.5±3.5 <0.001
 Injection time per replicate (sec) 315.1±58.3 298.0±60.7 NS
Oocytes aligned during procedure
 Total oocytes (n) 13 12
 Oocytes per replicate (n) 2.6±0.5 2.4±0.7 NS
 Injection time per oocyte (sec) 64.1±3.6 67.1±5.5 NS
 Injection time per replicate (sec) 176.3±32.6 146.3±46.3 NS

Values are presented as mean±standard error of the mean.

Start of the injection time was measured from collecting the sham ‘sperm’ with the injection needle.

The end of injection time occurred when the oocyte was released from the holding pipette (cICSI) or the injection needle leaves the microwell (microICSI).

Two methods were used for the microICSI procedure: either aligning all the oocytes at the start of the procedure before starting all injections (reported injection time does not include time taken to align oocytes, n=7 replicates), or aligning each oocyte as it was injected (n=5 replicates).

cICSI, conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NS, not significant.

References

1. Thompson JG, McLennan HJ, Heinrich SL, Inge MP, Gardner DK, Harvey AJ. A brief history of technical developments in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): dedicated to the memory of J.M. Cummins. Reprod Fertil Dev 2024;36:RD24047.
crossref pmid pdf
2. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17-8.
crossref pmid
3. Hajiyavand AM, Saadat M, Abena A, Sadak F, Sun X. Effect of injection speed on oocyte deformation in ICSI. Micromachines (Basel) 2019;10:226.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Diaz JF, Karzar-Jeddi M, Olgac N, Fan TH, Ergenc AF. Geometric characterization of cell membrane of mouse oocytes for ICSI. J Biomech Eng 2010;132:121002.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Iwayama H, Yamashita M. Quantitative evaluation of intercellular local deformation of human oocytes during Piezo-assisted intracytoplasmic sperm injection using video-based motion analysis. F S Sci 2021;2:124-34.
crossref pmid
6. Liu Y, Cui M, Sun Y, Feng Z, Bai Y, Sun M, et al. Oocyte orientation selection method based on the minimum strain position in the penetration process. J Appl Phys 2019;125:154701.
crossref pdf
7. Liu Y, Cui M, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Sun M, Zhao X. Oocyte penetration speed optimization based on intracellular strain. Micromachines (Basel) 2022;13:309.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Uppangala S, Dhiman S, Salian SR, Singh VJ, Kalthur G, Adiga SK. In vitro matured oocytes are more susceptible than in vivo matured oocytes to mock ICSI induced functional and genetic changes. PLoS One 2015;10:e0119735.
crossref pmid pmc
9. ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;35:494-510.
crossref pmid
10. Mizobe Y, Oya N, Iwakiri R, Yoshida N, Sato Y, Onoue N, et al. Developmental ability of embryos produced from oocytes with fragile oolemma by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:1685-90.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. McCulloh DH, Goorbarry J, Shah S, Ahmad K. Oocyte lysis following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: association with measures of oocyte quality and technician performance. J Reprod Stem Cell Biotechnol 2011;2:46-54.
crossref pdf
12. Palermo GD, Alikani M, Bertoli M, Colombero LT, Moy F, Cohen J, et al. Oolemma characteristics in relation to survival and fertilization patterns of oocytes treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1996;11:172-6.
crossref pmid
13. Dumoulin JM, Coonen E, Bras M, Bergers-Janssen JM, Ignoul-Vanvuchelen RC, van Wissen LC, et al. Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: effect of the injection procedure. Hum Reprod 2001;16:306-12.
crossref pmid
14. McLennan HJ, Blanch AJ, Wallace SJ, Ritter LJ, Heinrich SL, Gardner DK, et al. Nano-liter perfusion microfluidic device made entirely by two-photon polymerization for dynamic cell culture with easy cell recovery. Sci Rep 2023;13:562.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
15. Yagoub SH, Thompson JG, Orth A, Dholakia K, Gibson BC, Dunning KR. Fabrication on the microscale: a two-photon polymerized device for oocyte microinjection. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022;39:1503-13.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. McLennan HJ, Heinrich SL, Inge MP, Wallace SJ, Blanch AJ, Hails L, et al. A micro-fabricated device (microICSI) improves porcine blastocyst development and procedural efficiency for both porcine intracytoplasmic sperm injection and human microinjection. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024;41:297-309.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. Inge MP, McLennan HJ, Heinrich SL, Blanch AJ, Wallace SJ, Waite MB, et al. Improvements to intracytoplasmic sperm injection facilitated by a micron-3D printed device. Fertil Steril 2023;120:e196.
crossref
18. Murphy A, Lapczynski MS, Proctor G, Glynn TR, Domar AD, Gameiro S, et al. Comparison of embryologist stress, somatization, and burnout reported by embryologists working in UK HFEA-licensed ART/IVF clinics and USA ART/IVF clinics. Hum Reprod 2024;39:2297-304.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
19. Shirasawa H, Terada Y. Embryologist staffing in assisted reproductive technology laboratories: an international comparative review. Reprod Med Biol 2025;24:e12628.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Lee YS, Catt S, Cooke S, Fisk K, Mackenzie J, Mullen J, et al. Guidelines for best practice for staffing of ART laboratories and professional development of IVF scientists. Fertil Reprod 2023;5:163-75.
crossref
21. Rasband WS. ImageJ [Internet]. U.S. National Institutes of Health; 1997-2016 [cited 2026 Jan 28]. Available from: https://imagej.net/ij/

22. Luo Z, Guven S, Gozen I, Chen P, Tasoglu S, Anchan RM, et al. Deformation of a single mouse oocyte in a constricted microfluidic channel. Microfluid Nanofluidics 2015;19:883-90.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
23. Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Shen Y, Tinneberg HR. Manipulation of the oocyte: possible damage to the spindle apparatus. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;5:117-24.
crossref pmid
24. Kurokawa M, Fissore RA. ICSI-generated mouse zygotes exhibit altered calcium oscillations, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor-1 down-regulation, and embryo development. Mol Hum Reprod 2003;9:523-33.
crossref pmid
25. Hiraoka K, Tamaki T, Matsumura Y, Kiriake C, Uto H, Yoshida H, et al. Impact of the volume of cytoplasm aspirated into the injection pipette at the time of oolemma breakage on the fertilization rate after ICSI: a preliminary study. J Mamm Ova Res 2012;29:82-7.
crossref
26. Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Bocken G, Desmet B, Van Ranst H, et al. The influence of the site of sperm deposition and mode of oolemma breakage at intracytoplasmic sperm injection on fertilization and embryo development rates. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3171-7.
crossref pmid
27. Zander-Fox D, Green M, Watson K, Turner R, Bakos HW, Foo J, et al. Improved fertilization, degeneration, and embryo quality rates with PIEZO-intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a sibling oocyte split multicenter trial. Fertil Steril 2024;121:971-81.
crossref pmid
28. Fujii Y, Endo Y, Mitsuhata S, Hayashi M, Motoyama H. Evaluation of the effect of piezo-intracytoplasmic sperm injection on the laboratory, clinical, and neonatal outcomes. Reprod Med Biol 2020;19:198-205.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
29. Moser M, Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Gaisswinkler U, Jesacher K, Puchner M, et al. Laser-assisted zona pellucida thinning prior to routine ICSI. Hum Reprod 2004;19:573-8.
crossref pmid
30. Fawzy M, Emad M, Mahran A, Abdelrahman MY, Fetih AN, Abdelghafar H, et al. A randomized controlled trial of laser-assisted ICSI. Hum Reprod 2020;35:2692-700.
crossref pmid pdf
31. Thompson JG, Inge M, McLennan H, Heinrich S, Blanch A, Wallace S, et al. P-259 Intracytoplasmic sperm injection conducted within a micro 3D printed device that requires no holding pipette or vacuum reduces porcine oocyte invagination during microinjection. Hum Reprod 2023;38(Suppl 1):dead093.617.
crossref pdf
32. Jeong HG, Kim SK, Lee J, Youm HW, Jee BC. Injection funnel persistence time and oolemma resistance during intracytoplasmic sperm injection and subsequent embryo development. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021;47:3590-7.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Jesacher K, Tews G. A prospective study on oocyte survival rate after ICSI: influence of injection technique and morphological features. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:623-8.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
34. Danfour MA, Elmahaishi MS. Human oocyte oolemma characteristic is positively related to embryo developmental competence after ICSI procedure. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2010;15:269-73.
crossref
35. Yanagida K, Katayose H, Suzuki K, Suganuma A, Sato A. Flexibility of oolemma is an important factor for oocyte survival after ICSI. J Mamm Ova Res 2001;18:93-8.
crossref
36. Mizuno K, Okitsu O, Goto M, Kusuhara A, Kusuhara K. Polyvinylpyrrolidone can prevent oolemma lysis caused by abnormal rupture of the plasma membrane in Piezo-ICSI. Hum Cell 2024;37:951-8.
crossref pmid pdf
37. Yanez LZ, Han J, Behr BB, Pera RA, Camarillo DB. Human oocyte developmental potential is predicted by mechanical properties within hours after fertilization. Nat Commun 2016;7:10809.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
38. Bennabi I, Crozet F, Nikalayevich E, Chaigne A, Letort G, Manil-Segalen M, et al. Artificially decreasing cortical tension generates aneuploidy in mouse oocytes. Nat Commun 2020;11:1649.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
39. Krause I, Pohler U, Grosse S, Shebl O, Petek E, Chandra A, et al. Characterization of the injection funnel during intracytoplasmic sperm injection reflects cytoplasmic maturity of the oocyte. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1101-6.
crossref pmid
40. Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Puchner M, Wiesinger R, Tews G. Developmental competence of oocytes showing increased cytoplasmic viscosity. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1294-8.
crossref pmid
41. Murayama Y, Mizuno J, Kamakura H, Fueta Y, Nakamura H, Akaishi K, et al. Mouse zona pellucida dynamically changes its elasticity during oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development. Hum Cell 2006;19:119-25.
crossref pmid
42. Larson SM, Lee HJ, Hung PH, Matthews LM, Robinson DN, Evans JP. Cortical mechanics and meiosis II completion in mammalian oocytes are mediated by myosin-II and Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin (ERM) proteins. Mol Biol Cell 2010;21:3182-92.
crossref pmid pmc
43. Mackenzie AC, Kyle DD, McGinnis LA, Lee HJ, Aldana N, Robinson DN, et al. Cortical mechanics and myosin-II abnormalities associated with post-ovulatory aging: implications for functional defects in aged eggs. Mol Hum Reprod 2016;22:397-409.
crossref pmid pmc
44. Liu X, Fernandes R, Jurisicova A, Casper RF, Sun Y. In situ mechanical characterization of mouse oocytes using a cell holding device. Lab Chip 2010;10:2154-61.
crossref pmid
45. Liu X, Shi J, Zong Z, Wan KT, Sun Y. Elastic and viscoelastic characterization of mouse oocytes using micropipette indentation. Ann Biomed Eng 2012;40:2122-30.
crossref pmid pdf
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 1,579 View
  • 59 Download
Related articles in Clin Exp Reprod Med


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
82 Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea
Tel: +82-31-787-7254    CP: +82-10-9072-3154    E-mail: blasto@snubh.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next