A highly rare female phenotype with complex chromosomal mosaicism: 46,XY/45,X/46,X,r(Y)

Article information

Korean J Fertil Steril. 2025;.cerm.2025.08011
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 November 25
doi : https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2025.08011
1Research Center for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Shahid Akbarabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (ShACRDU), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5Department of Interventional Radiology, Firouzgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6Pediatric Urology Ward, Children Medical Center Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7Medical Oncology and Hematology Ward, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
8Rasoul Hospital, Department of Pathology Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Corresponding author: Maryam Eghbali Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Science (IUMS), No. 10, Firoozeh St, Vali-asr Ave, Vali-asr Sq, Tehran 1593716615, Iran Tel: +98-21-86701 Fax: +98-88945173 E-mail: eghbalim1385@gmail.com
Received 2025 March 21; Revised 2025 June 17; Accepted 2025 June 21.

Abstract

Objective

Mixed gonadal dysgenesis is characterized by abnormal genital appearance and chromosomal mosaicism. A wide spectrum of clinical manifestations can occur, ranging from females (with or without Turner syndrome) to phenotypically normal males with some degree of genital ambiguity. In this context, uncommon mosaic karyotypes are associated with distinctive phenotypic characteristics. Here, we present the case of an 18-year-old girl with primary amenorrhea, delayed puberty, and a rare mosaic karyotype pattern.

Methods

Clinical data were collected, and karyotyping was performed on peripheral blood samples. Polymerase chain reaction amplification for the sex-determining region Y protein (SRY) gene was also conducted.

Results

The patient presented with delayed puberty and primary amenorrhea. Her hormonal profile was consistent with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging revealed a small uterus. Echocardiography identified the presence of a bicuspid aortic valve. Karyotyping demonstrated a 46,XY/45,X/46,X,r(Y) pattern, indicating mosaicism for monosomy X and two cell lines: 45,X and 46,X,r(Y). The SRY gene was detected. Gonadal pathological investigation confirmed streak gonads consistent with gonadal dysgenesis and evidence of gonadoblastoma.

Conclusion

Complicated cases with mosaic chromosomal patterns can exhibit a wide range of phenotypic features, from apparently normal males with variable external genitalia to females with or without characteristics of Turner syndrome. These phenotypic discrepancies are not directly related to the number of mosaic cells or the specific location of Y chromosome breakage. Therefore, in cases of primary amenorrhea with genotype-phenotype discrepancies, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to guide appropriate sex determination and management.

Introduction

Differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) is the term used for individuals with congenital discrepancies between the sex chromosomes, gonadal tissue, and external genitalia. The medical approach to DSD depends on both the genital appearance and the specific type of DSD. Mixed gonadal dysgenesis (MGD) is a form of DSD characterized by atypical genital appearance and chromosomal mosaicism, arising when an individual possesses more than one chromosomally distinct cell line due to mitotic nondisjunction during the post-zygotic period. Because of the diversity in phenotypic presentation, the true prevalence of MGD remains unclear [1].

Notably, 45,X/46,XY mosaicism is a rare chromosomal abnormality, occurring in approximately 1.5 per 10,000 newborns, and is a significant contributor to ambiguous genitalia [2]. The clinical presentation of individuals with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism is highly variable, spanning from females (with or without Turner syndrome [TS]) to phenotypically normal males who exhibit some degree of genital ambiguity. Gender assignment at birth can be male or female, depending on the external appearance of the genitals [3]. Other uncommon mosaic karyotypes have also been reported, such as 45,X/47,XYY, 45,X/46,X,r(Y), 45,X/46,X,idic(Y), 45,X/46,Xdel(Y), 45,X/45,Y/46,XY/46,YY/47,XYY, among others [3-5]. Each of these mosaic patterns is associated with unique phenotypic features, including genital ambiguity, which can pose significant challenges for clinicians. In this context, we describe an 18-year-old female with primary amenorrhea and delayed puberty, who was found to have the exceedingly rare mosaic karyotype 46,XY/45,X/46,X,r(Y)(p?11.2q?12).

Methods

An 18-year-old phenotypically female patient was referred to our clinic with a complaint of primary amenorrhea. Clinical, physical, and histopathological assessments were performed by experienced clinicians, surgeons, and pathologists. Cytogenetic analysis was also conducted. Metaphase chromosomes from peripheral lymphocytes were analyzed using standard trypsin and GTG-banding techniques, achieving 500 to 550 band resolution for cytogenetic analysis. As per standard protocol, 50 random metaphase spreads were evaluated for each patient. Karyotypes were verified in accordance with the latest International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN 2020) guidelines for human chromosomes. Additionally, the presence of the Y chromosome sex-determining region Y protein (SRY) gene was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification on blood DNA extracted using specific primers. The patient provided informed consent for the use of her disease information, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (IR.IUMS.REC.1403.341).

Results

An 18-year-old female was referred to our endocrine clinic for the evaluation of primary amenorrhea. She was born at term via vaginal delivery. During the perinatal period, there was no history of maternal medication use. She is the only daughter of parents in a non-consanguineous marriage (Figure 1). There is no family history of irregular menstruation or premature ovarian failure. She experienced no significant medical issues or hospitalizations during infancy. After completing her education without interruption, she currently works as an English teacher. Socially, she maintains harmonious relationships with colleagues and students.

Figure 1.

Pedigree of the family of the patient. No similar phenotypes were observed in the family history.

Pubarche began at the age of 9. Approximately 3 years ago, due to delayed puberty, she was evaluated by a gynecologist who initiated estrogen therapy to promote breast development. After 1 year, treatment was switched to a combination of estrogen and progesterone, resulting in regular menstrual cycles, which occur only with consistent hormonal therapy. She also has a history of primary hypothyroidism, which is controlled with levothyroxine.

On examination, her weight was 55 kg and height was 157 cm, with a mid-parental height of 162 cm. There were no dysmorphic features or prominent stigmata of TS, such as webbed neck or cubitus valgus. The external genitalia appeared predominantly female, with a normal clitoral size (approximately 14 mm) and absent labia minora. There was no evidence of virilization, hirsutism, or acne.

Hormonal blood testing performed after discontinuation of hormonal therapy revealed hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (Table 1). Ultrasonography showed a small uterus measuring 28×8×5 mm. Gonads were not visualized, and no renal abnormalities were detected. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of a small uterus and gonads (Figure 2). Echocardiography, performed to screen for cardiac malformations, identified a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) without evidence of aortic root dilatation. Audiometric evaluation demonstrated normal hearing.

Results of the hormonal profile of the patient with mosaicism 46,XY/45,X/46,X,r(Y)

Figure 2.

Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (A) Sagittal T2 sequence of pelvic MRI, arrow shows a small uterus. (B) Axial T2 sequence of pelvic MRI, arrows show a left and right gonad with a follicle-like lesion.

The patient identified as female and expressed no concerns regarding her gender identity. Following thorough counseling with her and her parents about infertility and the risk of malignancy due to the presence of Y chromosomal material, she underwent laparotomic gonadectomy. Hormonal therapy was discontinued approximately 3 months before surgery to reduce thromboembolic risk. Intraoperatively, streak gonads were resected. Pathological examination revealed a portion of fallopian tube and remnants of epididymis with foci of gonadoblastoma (GB) and dysgerminoma-like tissue, with a tumor size of 1 cm within the dysgenetic gonad (Figure 3). On the contralateral side, fragments of fallopian tube with isolated primitive epididymis-like tissue within a fibrotic stroma were noted. Pathological findings were compatible with gonadal dysgenesis.

Figure 3.

Histopathology of the streak gonad. (A) Remnant of the epididymis surrounded by fibromuscular stroma; seminiferous tubules and ovarian follicles are absent. (B) Nests of primitive germ cells and sex cord-stromal cells within ovarian-type stroma, exhibiting foci of calcification (×20). (C) Nests of dysgerminoma-like germ cells and sex cord derivatives, resembling immature Sertoli and granulosa cells, arranged in nests and surrounded by ovarian stroma containing Leydig or lutein-type cells, with foci of calcification (×40). (D) Gonadoblastoma (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain, ×50). (E) Gonadoblastoma (H&E stain, ×400).

Despite the presence of primitive gonads, this unique mosaic karyotype could explain the observed female phenotype. Following surgery, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was resumed. Tumor markers including human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha-fetoprotein, and lactate dehydrogenase were undetectable. She remains under regular follow-up for HRT and monitoring of the aortic root dimension (current aortic size index: 1.5 cm/m²). She was also counseled that in vitro fertilization with donor oocytes could be considered if she wishes to pursue pregnancy in the future.

Chromosomal analysis revealed three distinct cell types by GTG-banding (Figure 4). Fifty metaphase spreads were examined. The karyotype was designated as 46,XY (68%)/45,X (18%)/46,X,r(Y)(p?11.2q?12) (14%). The presence of the SRY gene was confirmed by gene analysis.

Figure 4.

G banding karyotyping. (A) 46,XY. (B) 45,XO. (C) 46,X,r(Y).

Discussion

MGD characteristics include individuals with chromosomal mosaicism, atypical gonads, and a diverse range of internal and external reproductive organs. This diversity can result in a wide spectrum of phenotypes, ranging from males with normal appearances to females with TS-like features [6].

Among individuals with a 45,X/46,XY karyotype, phenotypic presentations include hormonal imbalances and gonadal developmental abnormalities, such as sexual ambiguity, which constitute approximately 60% of cases [5,7,8]. In males, phenotypic variability may extend from infertile men with otherwise normal external genitalia to those presenting with genital ambiguity and short stature [9]. Females with this mosaic pattern frequently present with gonadal dysgenesis and somatic dysmorphic features. Some cases lack a uterus and ovaries, whereas others, despite hypogonadism, may retain a uterus [10,11].

Based on previous studies, the phenotype of patients with sex chromosome mosaicism depends on several factors: (1) the distribution of mosaicism across various tissues, including both blood and gonads. Gonadal karyotyping is crucial for determining sexual differentiation status, regardless of the mosaicism percentage or the predominance of the 46,XY cell line with SRY present in lymphocytes [12,13]. (2) The structure of the rearranged Y chromosome and the presence of Y-chromosomal materials, including the SRY gene and other spermatogenesis-related genes, can significantly impact gonadal development [14,15]. (3) Mutations affecting the SRY gene or other essential testicular differentiation genes. The presence of the SRY gene alone does not guarantee function, as its expression and activity can be impaired by mutations, potentially preventing testicular development and resulting in phenotypic variability [15-17]. Additionally, certain challenges must be addressed due to discrepancies such as varying proportions of sex chromosomal cell lines in different tissues. Some studies suggest that the percentage of the 45,X cell line may influence gonadal determination, though this correlation remains inconsistent in several cases of 45,X/46,XY mosaicism [7,18-22]. Moreover, while the structure of the rearranged Y chromosome could theoretically affect phenotypic outcomes, one study in patients with a 45,X/46,XY mosaic pattern found that the sex of rearing was independent of the specific Y breakage site [23].

In this report, we present an 18-year-old female with primary amenorrhea, delayed puberty, and a hormonal profile indicative of hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, as well as a rare mosaic karyotype comprising a high percentage of 46,XY cells and minor populations of 45,X and 46,X,r(Y) cells. This rare karyotype (mos45,X/46,X,r(Y)/46,XY) has previously been reported in females with Turner features during the neonatal period [24]. Notably, our patient did not display dysmorphic or apparent Turner features.

The formation of male gonads is determined by genes on the Y chromosome, including the sex-determining gene (SRY) and spermatogenesis genes. Loss of the Y chromosome in the X monosomy cell line can lead to streak gonads [12]. Streak gonads are incapable of secreting testosterone, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and α-inhibin [25]. In our patient, insufficient testosterone secretion likely resulted in undeveloped epididymis and Wolffian duct, as well as female-appearing external genitalia. Furthermore, a lack of AMH secretion may have permitted development of Müllerian duct structures, such as the fallopian tubes and uterus.

Our patient’s karyotype demonstrates that male sexual differentiation did not predominate, despite a higher proportion of cells carrying Y chromosomal material (46,XY and 46,X,r(Y)) in lymphocytes. Several explanations may underlie this discrepancy. Importantly, the karyotype and SRY gene presence were determined from blood rather than gonadal tissue. Existing research indicates no direct correlation between the distribution of cell lines and the diversity of gender phenotypes [7,18-22].

The risk of GB in patients with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism appears to be associated with female phenotypes, and is higher in such individuals. Given the malignancy risk in these patients, early prophylactic gonadectomy is recommended [26]. Accordingly, gonadectomy was performed for our patient. Histopathology confirmed the presence of GB and dysgerminoma. Systematic reviews indicate that germ cell tumors (GCT) in patients with DSD are more common when gonadectomy occurs after age 15. Although five-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates for GCT in DSD patients remain good, these outcomes are worse than for ovarian or testicular GCTs [27].

A second concern in our case was the presence of a BAV, a condition that can progress to aortic aneurysm and valvular dysfunction. TS is the genetic syndrome most frequently associated with BAV. Reduced X chromosome copy number may predict BAV formation. While our patient did not display other TS features, the reduced number of X chromosomes may explain this cardiac finding [28]. BAV, hypertension, aortic coarctation, and aortic dilation are cardiovascular anomalies observed in approximately 20% to 40% of people with MGD [29]. Since it is reported that patients with 45,X/46,XY karyotypes may develop complications similar to those seen in TS [1], we recommended repeat cardiology evaluation and cardiac imaging every 5 to 10 years, following TS management guidelines [30]. As mortality is higher in patients with 45,X/46,XY karyotypes, especially in females and those with a Y chromosome [31], our patient needs long-term follow-up. The most common causes of mortality in individuals with this karyotype include congenital abnormalities, cardiovascular problems, and endocrinopathies.

Our study is limited by the absence of karyotyping in gonadal tissue to determine the percentage of mosaic cell lines and SRY distribution. Although the SRY gene was detected, full gene sequencing would be required to identify possible mutations. To detect minor genetic abnormalities in the Y chromosome, karyotyping is insufficient; PCR assays and molecular cytogenetic techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) arrays are necessary for precise delineation of Y chromosome breakpoints. These limitations preclude definitive correlation between chromosomal mosaicism and gender phenotype.

In summary, complex cases with mosaic patterns may display a broad array of phenotypic features, from apparently normal males with variable external genitalia to females with or without TS characteristics. These discrepancies are not determined solely by the number of mosaic cells or the site of Y chromosome breakage. Therefore, in cases of primary amenorrhea with discordant genotype and phenotype, a multidisciplinary approach is crucial for accurate sex determination and patient management.

Notes

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Mohammad Vasei., Professor of Pathology, at the Digestive Disease Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran for invaluable help in histopathological assessment of the gonad tissues. Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies were not used in the preparation of this work.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: ZM. Methodology: ZM, HI, SMG, FT, NE, ME. Formal analysis: ZM, MA, ME. Data curation: SMG, FT. Visualization: HI, SMG, FT, NE. Validation: ZM. Investigation: ZM, ME. Supervision: FG, MA. Writing-original draft: ZM, NE, ME. Writing-review & editing: MA, FG, NE. Approval of final manuscript: FG, ME.

References

1. Cobanogullari H, Akcan N, Ergoren MC. Non-invasive screening test paradox in a case born with mixed gonadal dysgenesis (45,X/46,Xy). Balkan J Med Genet 2023;26:57–62. 10.2478/bjmg-2023-0007. 37576786.
2. Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, Lee PA, ; LWPES Consensus Group, ; ESPE Consensus Group. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:554–63. 10.1136/adc.2006.098319. 16624884.
3. Lindhardt Johansen M, Hagen CP, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Kjærgaard S, Petersen BL, Skakkebæk NE, et al. 45,X/46,XY mosaicism: phenotypic characteristics, growth, and reproductive function: a retrospective longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E1540–9. 10.1210/jc.2012-1388. 22605431.
4. Nagaraja S, Castro Magana MS, Levine RL. Male with 45,X/46,X(r)Y mosaicism due to a ring Y chromosome: a case report. JOJ Case Stud 2018;6:555685. 10.19080/jojcs.2018.06.555685.
5. Layman LC, Tho SP, Clark AD, Kulharya A, McDonough PG. Phenotypic spectrum of 45,X/46,XY males with a ring Y chromosome and bilaterally descended testes. Fertil Steril 2009;91:791–7. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.078. 18555994.
6. Weidler EM, Pearson M, van Leeuwen K, Garvey E. Clinical management in mixed gonadal dysgenesis with chromosomal mosaicism: considerations in newborns and adolescents. Semin Pediatr Surg 2019;28:150841. 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2019.150841. 31668295.
7. Telvi L, Lebbar A, Del Pino O, Barbet JP, Chaussain JL. 45,X/46,XY mosaicism: report of 27 cases. Pediatrics 1999;104(2 Pt 1):304–8. 10.1542/peds.104.2.304. 10429013.
8. Gantt PA, Byrd JR, Greenblatt RB, McDonough PG. A clinical and cytogenetic study of fifteen patients with 45,X/46XY gonadal dysgenesis. Fertil Steril 1980;34:216–21. 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44950-2. 7409242.
9. Mohammadpour Lashkari F, Sadighi Gilani MA, Ghaheri A, Zamanian MR, Borjian Boroujeni P, Mohseni Meybodi A, et al. Clinical aspects of 49 infertile males with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism karyotype: a case series. Andrologia 2018;50e13009. 10.1111/and.13009. 29527714.
10. Muntaj S, Ganaie FA, Purva SV, Radhika S, Tilak P. Karyotypic variables in Turner syndrome: a case series. Int J Sci Stud 2015;3:171–5.
11. Alhajjaj A, Altarouti SA, Alkhabbaz F. Mosaic Turner syndrome with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism and apparent absent uterus. Cureus 2021;13e14816. 10.7759/cureus.14816. 34094770.
12. Fredj MB, Messaoud M, Youssef SB, Mani S, Laaribi S, Sakka R, et al. Phenotypic variability and management of patients with mosaic monosomy X and Y chromosome material: a case series. Ital J Pediatr 2024;50:93. 10.1186/s13052-024-01618-9. 38715086.
13. Nomura R, Miyai K, Okada M, Kajiwara M, Ono M, Ogata T, et al. A 45,X/46,XY DSD (disorder of sexual development) case with an extremely uneven distribution of 46,XY cells between lymphocytes and gonads. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2015;24:11–4. 10.1297/cpe.24.11. 25678755.
14. Baer TG, Freeman CE, Cujar C, Mansukhani M, Singh B, Chen X, et al. Prevalence and physical distribution of SRY in the gonads of a woman with Turner syndrome: phenotypic presentation, tubal formation, and malignancy risk. Horm Res Paediatr 2017;88:291–7. 10.1159/000477240. 28618411.
15. Alvarez-Nava F, Soto M, Martinez MC, Prieto M, Alvarez Z. FISH and PCR analyses in three patients with 45,X/46,X,idic(Y) karyotype: clinical and pathologic spectrum. Ann Genet 2003;46:443–8. 10.1016/s0003-3995(03)00016-9. 14659779.
16. Domenice S, Yumie Nishi M, Correia Billerbeck AE, Latronico AC, Aparecida Medeiros M, Russell AJ, et al. A novel missense mutation (S18N) in the 5' non-HMG box region of the SRY gene in a patient with partial gonadal dysgenesis and his normal male relatives. Hum Genet 1998;102:213–5. 10.1007/s004390050680. 9521592.
17. Canto P, de la Chesnaye E, Lopez M, Cervantes A, Chavez B, Vilchis F, et al. A mutation in the 5' non-high mobility group box region of the SRY gene in patients with Turner syndrome and Y mosaicism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:1908–11. 10.1210/jc.85.5.1908. 10843173.
18. Alvarez-Nava F, Gonzalez S, Soto S, Pineda L, Morales-Machin A. Mixed gonadal dysgenesis: a syndrome of broad clinical, cytogenetic and histopathologic spectrum. Genet Couns 1999;10:233–43. 10546094.
19. Kofman S, Perez-Palacios G, Medina M, Escobar N, Garcia M, Ruz L, et al. Clinical and endocrine spectrum in patients with the 45,X/46,XY karyotype. Hum Genet 1981;58:373–6. 10.1007/bf00282818. 6799384.
20. Mendez JP, Ulloa-Aguirre A, Kofman-Alfaro S, Mutchinick O, Fernandez-del-Castillo C, Reyes E, et al. Mixed gonadal dysgenesis: clinical, cytogenetic, endocrinological, and histopathological findings in 16 patients. Am J Med Genet 1993;46:263–7. 10.1002/ajmg.1320460304. 8488868.
21. Tho SP, Behzadian A, Byrd JR, McDonough PG. Correlation of the testicular determinant factor sequence zinc finger Y with varying gonadal phenotypes in a series of 13 subjects with gonadal dysgenesis due to Y aneuploidy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163(6 Pt 1):1968–75. 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90782-3. 2256509.
22. Wallace TM, Levin HS. Mixed gonadal dysgenesis: a review of 15 patients reporting single cases of malignant intratubular germ cell neoplasia of the testis, endometrial adenocarcinoma, and a complex vascular anomaly. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:679–88. 2163601.
23. Vogt PH, Besikoglu B, Bettendorf M, Frank-Herrmann P, Zimmer J, Bender U, et al. Sex chromosome DSD individuals with mosaic 45,X0 and aberrant Y chromosomes in 46,XY cells: distinct gender phenotypes and germ cell tumour risks. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2022;68:247–57. 10.1080/19396368.2022.2057258. 35481403.
24. Wegner RD, Scherer G, Pohlschmidt M, L'Allemand D, Gal A. Ring Y chromosome: cytogenetic and molecular characterization. Clin Genet 1992;42:71–5. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1992.tb03142.x. 1424234.
25. Lepais L, Morel Y, Mouriquand P, Gorduza D, Plotton I, Collardeau-Frachon S, et al. A novel morphological approach to gonads in disorders of sex development. Mod Pathol 2016;29:1399–414. 10.1038/modpathol.2016.123. 27469328.
26. Matsumoto F, Matsuyama S, Matsui F, Yazawa K, Matsuoka K. Variation of gonadal dysgenesis and tumor risk in patients with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism. Urology 2020;137:157–60. 10.1016/j.urology.2019.12.014. 31883875.
27. Morin J, Peard L, Vanadurongvan T, Walker J, Donmez MI, Saltzman AF. Oncologic outcomes of pre-malignant and invasive germ cell tumors in patients with differences in sex development: a systematic review. J Pediatr Urol 2020;16:576–82. 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.002. 32564942.
28. Bravo-Jaimes K, Prakash SK. Genetics in bicuspid aortic valve disease: where are we? Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2020;63:398–406. 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.06.005. 32599026.
29. Hatano M, Fukuzawa R, Hasegawa Y. The mosaicism ratio of 45,X may explain the phenotype in a case of mixed gonadal dysgenesis. Sex Dev 2018;12:175–9. 10.1159/000489451. 29879705.
30. Silberbach M, Roos-Hesselink JW, Andersen NH, Braverman AC, Brown N, Collins RT, et al. Cardiovascular health in Turner syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Genom Precis Med 2018;11e000048. 10.1161/hcg.0000000000000048. 30354301.
31. Stochholm K, Holmgard C, Davis SM, Gravholt CH, Berglund A. Incidence, prevalence, age at diagnosis, and mortality in individuals with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism: a population-based registry study. Genet Med 2024;26:100987. 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100987. 37781900.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Pedigree of the family of the patient. No similar phenotypes were observed in the family history.

Figure 2.

Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (A) Sagittal T2 sequence of pelvic MRI, arrow shows a small uterus. (B) Axial T2 sequence of pelvic MRI, arrows show a left and right gonad with a follicle-like lesion.

Figure 3.

Histopathology of the streak gonad. (A) Remnant of the epididymis surrounded by fibromuscular stroma; seminiferous tubules and ovarian follicles are absent. (B) Nests of primitive germ cells and sex cord-stromal cells within ovarian-type stroma, exhibiting foci of calcification (×20). (C) Nests of dysgerminoma-like germ cells and sex cord derivatives, resembling immature Sertoli and granulosa cells, arranged in nests and surrounded by ovarian stroma containing Leydig or lutein-type cells, with foci of calcification (×40). (D) Gonadoblastoma (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain, ×50). (E) Gonadoblastoma (H&E stain, ×400).

Figure 4.

G banding karyotyping. (A) 46,XY. (B) 45,XO. (C) 46,X,r(Y).

Table 1.

Results of the hormonal profile of the patient with mosaicism 46,XY/45,X/46,X,r(Y)

Hormonal profile Results Normal range
Serum estradiol (pg/mL) 18 30–400
Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (mIU/mL) 64.5 0.3–10
Serum luteinizing hormone (mIU/mL) 18.5 0.8–8.6
Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (ng/mL) 162 43–241
Serum testosterone (ng/mL) 0.55 0.2–0.75
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (mIU/L) 1.09 0.45–4.12