Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma was first recognized in 1959. Two years after its original description, nine cases were reported from the files of the Mayo Clinic. The first case of extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (EMC) was described in 1964. EMC accounts for about 1% of all chondrosarcomas. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma was initially considered restricted to the bone, but that is no longer the case [
4]. A more recent analysis of reported cases concluded that 20% to 33% of these tumors occur in extraskeletal tissues. EMC is a rare subtype of chondrosarcoma, of chondroprogenitor cell origin [
4]. The most common sites of origin of chondrosarcoma are the lower extremities, which are known as the primary sites, followed by the meninges, lung, neck, mandible, heart, and orbit. It is more common in women and mainly presents in the second to third decades of life [
4,
5]. Although most cases of uterine chondrosarcoma have been reported in postmenopausal women, our case was in reproductive age. In the head and neck, chondrosarcoma usually begins between the fourth and seventh decades of life. It has also been suggested that primary pure heterologous sarcomas may arise from primitive embryonal cell remnants or from a complete stromal overgrowth of a Mullerian mixed tumor. Another etiology appears to be related to the uncontrolled proliferation of Merkel cells (embryonic remains) [
1,
2]. Chondrosarcoma is also uncommon during pregnancy, and to the best of our knowledge no cases of proven primary ovarian chondrosarcoma in pregnancy have been reported in the literature; with regard to chondrosarcoma arising primarily in the ovary, only two cases have been reported in the English-language literature [
6]. There are also some reports of primary carcinosarcomas of the uterus in the literature, although this is also a very rare condition, with 17 cases reported to date [
7]. In fact, only 10 cases of gestational chondrosarcomas have been described in the literature and none of these cases affected the ovaries. The effect of pregnancy on the growth features of chondrosarcomas remains unclear. Some experts have suggested a growth-enhancing effect of altered hormone levels on various bone tumors during pregnancy [
2]. In addition, it still remains unclear whether chondrosarcoma during pregnancy may show progression or dedifferentiation according to the changes in hormonal status [
1]. There are reports of G1 skeletal chondrosarcoma with fast progression during the course of pregnancy in the literature. The survival rates of pregnant women with chondrosarcoma of the extremities are not likely to differ from those of non-pregnant women. However, no epidemiological data exist on the prognosis and survival rate of ovarian chondrosarcoma during pregnancy. Complications during pregnancy and delivery have only been reported for pelvic tumors; these complications include distant metastases, recurrent pain, and fetal growth restriction. As our patient’s pregnancy was terminated spontaneously after surgery, we cannot add any data on this issue [
1]. EMC has a biphasic histologic pattern comprising small cells and islands of hyaline cartilage [
4]. Chondrosarcoma is divided into several subtypes, and 90% are considered as mainly slow-growing tumors with a low risk of metastases. Histologically, chondrosarcoma is graded as G1–3, although G1 has recently been named atypical cartilaginous tumor. G3 tumors are known to have a likelihood of metastasis [
1]. These tumors are diagnosed primarily based on morphology, as they have a nonspecific immune profile, and no molecular diagnostic characteristics of these tumors have been specified. On immunohistochemistry, the cartilaginous component of these tumors is strongly positive for S100 protein and the undifferentiated component is positive for CD99, as in our case. Some recent studies have discovered Sox9 as a marker that shows nuclear positivity in both undifferentiated and cartilaginous components. Other markers, including cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, and muscle markers, are usually negative. However, rare cases showing scattered tumor cells with desmin, myogenin, and myoD1 positivity have also been described in tumors with areas of rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation. As described above, in our case with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation, the specimen was positive for myogenin. Overall, no single best stain for this tumor has been identified, and a group of stains should be used to reach a certain diagnosis. Molecular genetic characteristics of these tumors can now be detected, including translocation (9;22) (q22; q11), resulting in the EWSR1/NR4A3 sequence in the majority of patients [
5]. Wide and adequate resection of the involved area to treat localized disease is the most promising treatment option for EMC, followed by adjuvant systemic chemotherapy to treat metastatic cases. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been reported to increase the survival rate in some studies, but there is not enough evidence to reach a consensus on this matter [
4,
5,
7]. In general, EMC is known as a highly potent tumor for distant metastasis. Most tumors are low- to intermediate-grade, although our case involved a high-grade tumor, and the clinical course tends to be prolonged in most patients. The prognosis and survival rate depend on the location of the tumor [
3,
4]. There is no strong evidence favoring a specific optimal option for systemic therapy. Given the aggressive nature of this tumor and poor response to treatment, some experts prefer watchful waiting in metastatic cases following wide local excision [
5]. Due to the rarity of this entity, there is no established treatment protocol, and we speculated that this chemotherapy might be of benefit in this case, as the tumor was grade 3 and had a high mitotic rate. The patient had no signs of recurrence 6 months after initial wide local surgery [
6]. Data on systemic treatment during pregnancy have not been reported. Despite its ethical issues, termination of pregnancy in non-obstetric chondrosarcoma may also be an option, especially during the first trimester, but it has not been recommended routinely. The absence of other valid therapy options provides the strongest arguments for a surgical approach with the maintenance of pregnancy in cases of chondrosarcomas of the extremities during pregnancy, specifically in the second and third trimesters [
1]. A recent retrospective review reported a 68.2% 5-year disease-free survival rate of this malignancy [
4]. In another study, the authors concluded that EMC has a relatively favorable prognosis. Some studies have detected relatively long survival times in EMC, even with metastatic disease (3±5 years). A study reported greater cellularity and a higher mitotic rate with a higher likelihood of distant metastases. Nonetheless, in another two studies, the investigators found no relationship between cellularity and prognosis in EMC [
3].