Understanding the molecular mechanisms of bisphenol A action in spermatozoa

Article information

Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2019;46(3):99-106
Publication date (electronic) : 2019 September 1
doi : https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.00276
Department of Animal Science and Technology and BET Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Korea
Corresponding author: Myung-Geol Pang Department of Animal Science and Technology and BET Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, 4726 Seodong-daero, Daedeok-myeon, Anseong 17546, Korea Tel: +82-31-670-4841 Fax: +82-31-675-9001 E-mail: mgpang@cau.ac.kr
*

The research discussed here from our group was mostly funded by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025159). Md Saidur Rahman was supported by the Korea Research Fellowship (KRF) Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (project no. 2017H1D3A1A02013844).

Received 2019 May 13; Revised 2019 July 12; Accepted 2019 July 25.

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine-disrupting chemical that is capable of interfering with the normal function of the endocrine system in the body. Exposure to this chemical from BPA-containing materials and the environment is associated with deleterious health effects, including male reproductive abnormalities. A search of the literature demonstrated that BPA, as a toxicant, directly affects the cellular oxidative stress response machinery. Because of its hormone-like properties, it can also bind with specific receptors in target cells. Therefore, the tissue-specific effects of BPA mostly depend on its endocrine-disrupting capabilities and the expression of those particular receptors in target cells. Although studies have shown the possible mechanisms of BPA action in various cell types, a clear consensus has yet to be established. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of BPA action in spermatozoa by compiling existing information in the literature.

Introduction

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a major environmental pollutant widely used to manufacture numerous consumer products, including food packaging materials, industrial supplies, dental sealant, and thermal paper receipts. Exposure to this chemical through the oral, respiratory, and dermal routes is ubiquitous in both humans and animals [1,2]. Originally, BPA was used as a growth promoter for cattle and poultry [3], but it was later proven that this chemical interferes with the regular hormonal functions of the body, subsequently predisposing individuals to deleterious health effects [4-6]. As summarized by Rochester [7], exposure to BPA is associated with cardiovascular diseases, abnormalities of brain development, obesity, thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, breast cancer, and infertility.

As a male reproductive toxicant, exposure to this chemical is associated with abnormalities of testicular cell function and spermatogenesis, a decrease in sperm production and formation of morphological abnormal spermatozoa, defects of accessory sex gland function, and subfertility/infertility [7-9]. BPA, at the dose currently considered acceptable, is also capable of interfering with reproductive and developmental defects in laboratory animals, aquatic species, and wildlife [1,10,11]. However, the current understanding of BPA action in cells is mostly uncertain. In this review, we summarize the mechanism of BPA action in spermatozoa by compiling existing information in the literature. In particular, we discuss how BPA affects spermatozoa, because the spermatozoon is an excellent model for understanding the effects of BPA on male fertility and reproduction.

Molecular mechanisms of BPA action in spermatozoa: in vitro

In vitro experimental models have greatly advanced our understanding of how to screen for chemical toxicity from the public health perspective. In addition, in vitro models are rapid, economical, and require less labor to make preliminary assumptions about a toxic chemical. In fact, our current understanding of the action of BPA is mostly derived from in vitro experimental findings. In this section, we review how BPA affects sperm function and fertility following direct in vitro exposure.

1. BPA-induced compromise of cellular stress response mechanisms

Spermatozoa are highly susceptible to oxidative stress because they lose the majority of their cytoplasm in the final stage of spermatogenesis [12]. Oxidative stress facilitates cellular damage by increasing levels of oxygen and oxygen-derived oxidants, commonly known as reactive oxygen species (ROS). Although ROS are important for normal sperm function at low levels, excessive levels of ROS have detrimental effects on motility, capacitation, and the acrosome reaction of spermatozoa [13,14]. Furthermore, high levels of ROS can damage lipids, proteins, and DNA in spermatozoa [15]. Recently, we showed that exposure of mouse spermatozoa to 100-μM BPA potentially arrested the oxidative stress response mechanism, as measured by elevated ROS [5,6]. In addition, we also reported that a BPA-induced increase in ROS levels in spermatozoa was associated with a premature acrosome reaction, loss of sperm motility, viability, ionic imbalance, and alterations of the sperm proteome (Figure 1) [5,6]. Increased ROS and lipid peroxidation have also been reported by other recent studies following in vitro exposure to BPA in spermatozoa and other cells [16]. Thus BPA, as a toxic chemical, compromises the oxidative stress response machinery of spermatozoa, thereby affecting their ability for fertilization.

Figure 1.

Changes in spermatozoa following exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) in vitro. BPA may bind with either G protein-coupled receptors (GPR30) or estrogen receptors (ERs) located in the plasma membrane. BPA-mediated activation of these non-genomic receptors or increased stress caused by elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) in spermatozoa rapidly phosphorylates (P) mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), and protein kinase A (PKA). In addition, it causes phosphorylation of sperm proteins in tyrosine residues (Tyr-P). All these conditions are responsible for the modification of coregulatory function and subsequently predispose individuals to abnormal cellular outcomes.

2. Receptor-dependent mechanisms of BPA action

Circulating hormones come into contact with all cells in the body; however, they only affect the target cells that contain specific receptors for the hormone. Since BPA possesses hormone-like properties, its action in target cells is mostly related to the availability of particular receptors in cells. A comprehensive search of the literature demonstrated that BPA acts as an estrogen receptor (ER) modulator [6], stimulates estrogen-related receptor gamma [17] and growth factor receptors [18], and exerts anti-androgenic [19] and anti-thyroid activity [20]. Recently, Naz and Sellamuthu [21] reported that mature mammalian spermatozoa express ERα, ERβ, growth factor receptors, and androgen receptors, meaning that the effects of BPA on spermatozoa could also be regulated via receptor-dependent signaling. To date, several mechanisms of BPA action have been investigated, but particular attention has been directed towards its ability to bind with ER in various cell types, including spermatozoa. A dynamic simulation interaction of BPA with a typical ERα is shown in Figure 2. ERα contains a missing residue at 3UU7 that could bind with BPA, and doing so keeps the receptor in its active conformation.

Figure 2.

Interaction mechanism of bisphenol A (BPA) with estrogen receptors (ERs). A dynamic simulation demonstrating the interaction mechanism between BPA and a typical ERα. The atom coordinates of the complexes of ERα-BPA (PDB code: 3UU7, 2.2 Å) were obtained from the RCSB Protein Data Bank. As there were missing residues in 3UU7, Chimera 1.13 was used to add these missing residues in the loop regions. The added loops were refined through the loop refinement protocol. This structural analysis suggested that BPA could interact with the receptors on spermatozoa by mimicking the action of a natural hormone and keeping the ERs in an active conformation.

As a ER modulator, BPA works via genomic and non-genomic pathways (Figure 3). In the genomic pathway, it binds with the ERs located in the cytoplasm (cERs) or directly binds with the ERs located in the nucleus (nERs). The binding modifies overall receptor signaling, affects nuclear chromatin function, and regulates the transcription/translation of proteins/genes, thereby affecting cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival [6,22]. In non-genomic signaling, BPA interacts with G protein-coupled receptors (GPR30) and membranebound ERs (mERs). Activation of these receptors triggers rapid estrogenic signaling via activation of cellular kinase systems such as protein kinase A (PKA), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), and changes in levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate, protein kinase C, and intracellular calcium, as demonstrated in the pancreatic islets [18], and human ovarian cancer cells (Figure 3) [23,24]. However, genomic ERs (e.g., cERs and nERs) are absent in mature spermatozoa; therefore, BPA mostly affects spermatozoa through non-genomic pathways by interacting with GPR30 and mERs [6]. Recently, we reported that exposure of mouse spermatozoa to >1 μM BPA led to the rapid phosphorylation of p38, p85, PKA, and tyrosine [5,6]. Phosphorylation of p38 and p85 represents the activation of the MAPK and PI3K kinase system in cells, respectively. In support of our observation, Wan et al. [25] also reported an increase in PKA and tyrosine phosphorylation in spermatozoa following in vitro exposure to BPA (Figure 1).

Figure 3.

Mechanisms of bisphenol A (BPA) action through the modification of estrogen receptors (ERs). Both genomic and non-genomic pathways have been highlighted in this figure. A detailed description of each pathway is given in the main text of the manuscript. GPR30, G protein-coupled receptors; mER, membrane-bound ER; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; cER, cytoplasmic ER; P, phosphorylation; TF, transcription factor; nER, nuclear ER.

In both genomic and non-genomic signaling, modified ERs in cells alter the activities of coregulatory proteins/genes via transcriptional and translational modifications [22]. However, mammalian spermatozoa are silent in both transcription and translation [2,26-28]. Therefore, it is difficult to explain BPA-mediated estrogenic effects in spermatozoa. Notably, post-translational modifications (such as protein phosphorylation, glycosylation, and so on) are very common in spermatozoa and play a major role in modifying the sperm proteome, which is responsible for the functional maturation of spermatozoa before fertilization [1,29]. Therefore, together with other researchers in this field, we suggest that the modification of coregulatory proteins in spermatozoa occurs mostly because of posttranslational modification of these proteins (Figure 1).

As an androgen receptor antagonist, BPA was found to inhibit the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of androgen receptors in monkey kidney cells [30]. Inhibition of androgen receptors through this mechanism subsequently activates interaction of these receptors with the silencing mediator for thyroid hormone receptors and the nuclear receptor co-repressor, subsequently suppressing cell proliferation [30]. However, similar mechanisms have not yet been studied in spermatozoa.

Mechanisms of BPA action in spermatozoa following in vivo exposure

The effects of BPA on spermatozoa in vivo are mostly exerted via the alteration of the hormonal functions in the body that regulate testicular spermatogenesis, the process of mammalian sperm production. Testicular cells (such as Sertoli and Leydig cells) play a critical role in the development of germ cells/spermatozoa. Although the factors regulate spermatogenesis are not completely understood, complex hormonal messaging through endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine signaling is required for the production of healthy spermatozoa [31,32]. BPA may affect spermatozoa through the following pathways, by manipulating the testicular environment or affecting testicular cell function.

1. Manipulation of reproductive hormone functions

Mammalian spermatogenesis is coordinated by the hypothalamicpituitary-testicular axis and the activity of the thyroid hormones [20]. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals such as BPA can easily disrupt this axis, thereby affecting/halting spermatogenesis. Increased serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) and decreased levels of testosterone were reported in men in Guizhou Province, China following environmental exposure to BPA [33]. The anterior pituitary releases FSH, which increases the production of androgen-binding protein in Sertoli cells to enhance testicular growth. Simultaneously, LH from the same origins acts on testicular Leydig cells to stimulate testosterone production, which also plays a major role in spermatogenesis [33]. Meanwhile, reduced thyroid hormone levels were reported in newborn babies following prenatal BPA exposure [34]. Although an earlier investigation suggested that thyroid hormone plays a negligible role in male fertility, it is now being recognized that it exerts a significant effect on sperm production [35]. Similar effects of BPA on gonadotropic and thyroid hormones have been reported in many in vivo animal studies (reviewed in [36]) by which it could affect the production and function of spermatozoa.

2. Effects of BPA on spermatogenesis: receptor-dependent mechanisms

BPA may also affect the spermatogenesis process via antiestrogenic and androgenic pathways. It has been reported that exposure of male Wistar rats to BPA for 9 days significantly increased the proportion of stage VII seminiferous epithelium and decreased the amount of stage VIII seminiferous epithelium in the testis [37]. Apoptosis of testicular germ cells at stages VII and VIII was also shown in another study following exposure to 17-β estradiol in male rats [38]. The transformation of spherical spermatids into elongated spermatozoa is known as spermiogenesis, which occurs in stage VII and VIII seminiferous epithelium. Therefore, alteration of these stages, including apoptosis, is directly linked to the reduction of sperm concentration [38]. BPA-mediated adverse effects on spermatogenesis also have been reported in male goldfish, along with alterations of total sperm number, volume, and motility [39,40].

Recently, we have shown that gestational exposure to BPA for 7 days decreased the concentration and motility of F1 spermatozoa during adulthood [1]. This is because of a decrease in the number of stage VIII seminiferous epithelial cells in the testis and a decline in intracellular ATP levels in F1 male spermatozoa. Testicular development starts at the early stage of fetal development. BPA is capable of passing through the placenta to a developing embryo; therefore, a developing fetus has a high risk of BPA exposure from endogenous sources. As such, BPA can bind with ERs located in the testis and causes harmful effects on germ cell differentiation, sperm production, and levels of male reproductive hormones during adulthood [41]. In fact, early testicular development is highly sensitive to estrogens and to estrogenic compounds such as BPA. Delbes et al. [42] reported that mouse germ cells expressed ERβ from 14 to 26 days post-conception, and that inactivation of ERβ led to a 50% increase in the germ cell population. In another study, Jefferson et al. [43] reported the expression of ERα mRNA in the testicular interstitial cells (Leydig) cells at 26 days after birth, and its function was found to be related to testosterone hormone signaling (Figure 4). Therefore, BPA may affect the testicular cell population and spermatogenesis through a receptor-dependent signaling pathway. However, further studies are required to prove this hypothesis conclusively.

Figure 4.

An outline of the distribution of estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) in the developing testis (A) and the possible mechanism of bisphenol A (BPA) action in testicular and germ cells in the developing (A) and adult testis (B). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have a major detrimental effect on testicular cells and on the growth and differentiation of germ cells, as mediated by developmental exposure to BPA. A detailed description of each step is provided in the main text.

3. BPA-mediated oxidative stress in testicular cells

Physiologically, the oxygen levels in the testis are lower than in other cells/tissues because of functional weakness of the testicular artery. To maintain very high levels of cell division for germ cell production/differentiation, testicular cells are in severe competition for oxygen [44]. Therefore, testicular cells and the process of spermatogenesis are extremely prone to oxidative stress, which may lead to abnormal sperm production and the generation of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa. A recent study conducted by Kaur et al. [45] demonstrated that BPA exposure for 8 weeks in male mice was responsible for a dramatic increase in the testicular ROS and lipid peroxidation, with associated loss of sperm concentration and motility. Consistently, male rats exposed to BPA (10 mg/kg body weight) for 14 days were found to have increased testicular oxidative stress, as detected by elevated antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase in the testis [46]. When BPA-exposed rats were fed α-lipoic acid (an antioxidant) [47], testicular mitochondrial toxicity/oxidative stress conditions were significantly overcome [46]. In a recent study, we showed that exposure of pregnant mice to BPA for 7 days increased oxidative stress in spermatozoa even in F1 male mice during adulthood [1]. Increased oxidative stress directly affects DNA, lipids, and antioxidant enzymes in germ cells, subsequently causing apoptosis and leading to a decline in semen parameters associated with male infertility [48]. These findings have led researchers to believe that apart from its major endocrine-disrupting properties, BPA also perturbs the pro-oxidant and anti-oxidant balance in testis cells, thereby affecting spermatozoa.

4. BPA-induced modification of sperm epigenetics

Growing evidence supports the impact of lifestyle and environmental factors, not only on the health of an exposed individual, but also influencing the phenotypes of further generations [49-51]. This takes place via parental germ-line alterations, such as the transmission of paternal information to the offspring by remodeling the epigenetic programming of spermatozoa. Although the basic concept of epigenetics is not a new idea, the field of environmental epigenetics has significantly expanded in the last decade. A search of the literature demonstrated that parental exposure to BPA is capable of modifying sperm epigenetics [50], notably by DNA methylation, histone modifications, and interference of non-coding microRNAs in spermatozoa, thereby leading to transgenerational effects. In a pioneering study, Manikkam et al. [52,53] demonstrated an increased disease incidence in F3-generation male and female rats with associated differential DNA methylation regions in the sperm epigenome following gestational exposure to BPA in F0 mothers. Recently, altered protein expression in the spermatozoa (both capacitated and non-capacitated) of F1 male mice was reported by our group following gestational exposure to BPA [1,2]. However, similar studies have yet to be conducted to elucidate a more detailed understanding of the BPA-mediated perturbation of offspring health mediated via sperm epigenetic transmission.

Conclusions

Exposure to environmental contaminants may be the most prominent factor affecting male fertility/reproduction. As a common environmental contaminant, developmental exposure to BPA is associated with deleterious health effects in both animals and humans, including many aspects of reproduction in exposed individuals, as well as their offspring in subsequent generations. Simultaneously, the effects of BPA are especially severe when the exposure is associated with other risk factors, such as poor diet and concurrent diseases. Leung et al. [54] reported that BPA exposure in pregnant rats fed a high-butterfat diet increased the incidence of mammary tumors in offspring in comparison to rats with a high-butterfat diet only. Moreover, male obesity was found to be associated with a reduction in sperm quality, as manifested by low sperm count and motility [55]. Therefore, BPA-mediated adverse effects on fertility/reproduction in obese individuals might more prominent and could follow different mechanisms of action. Therefore, it is very difficult to hypothesize which mechanism BPA follows to affect spermatozoa or other cells under a particular exposure condition. However, it is true that BPA, at high doses, strongly suppresses oxidative stress machinery in spermatozoa following in vitro exposure. In contrast, in in vivo conditions, BPA may trigger different signaling cascades in spermatozoa, modify the sperm epigenetic machinery, and impact the growth and development of the testicular cell population, including spermatozoa. Thus, more studies should be conducted in the near future to elucidate the exact molecular mechanism of BPA action in spermatozoa and other cells.

Notes

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, review & editing: all authors.

References

1. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Karmakar PC, Yoon SJ, Ryu BY, Pang MG. Gestational exposure to bisphenol A affects the function and proteome profile of F1 spermatozoa in adult mice. Environ Health Perspect 2017;125:238–45.
2. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Ryu DY, Khatun A, Karmakar PC, Ryu BY, et al. Functional and proteomic alterations of F1 capacitated spermatozoa of adult mice following gestational exposure to bisphenol A. J Proteome Res 2018;17:524–35.
3. Erler C, Novak J. Bisphenol a exposure: human risk and health policy. J Pediatr Nurs 2010;25:400–7.
4. Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, Rubin BS, Soto AM. Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev 2009;30:75–95.
5. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Lee JS, Yoon SJ, Ryu BY, Pang MG. Bisphenol-A affects male fertility via fertility-related proteins in spermatozoa. Sci Rep 2015;5:9169.
6. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Yoon SJ, Park YJ, Ryu BY, Pang MG. A novel approach to assessing bisphenol-A hazards using an in vitro model system. BMC Genomics 2016;17:577.
7. Rochester JR. Bisphenol A and human health: a review of the literature. Reprod Toxicol 2013;42:132–55.
8. Heindel JJ, Newbold RR, Bucher JR, Camacho L, Delclos KB, Lewis SM, et al. NIEHS/FDA CLARITY-BPA research program update. Reprod Toxicol 2015;58:33–44.
9. Ryu DY, Rahman MS, Pang MG. Determination of highly sensitive biological cell model systems to screen BPA-related health hazards using Pathway Studio. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:E1909.
10. Flint S, Markle T, Thompson S, Wallace E. Bisphenol A exposure, effects, and policy: a wildlife perspective. J Environ Manage 2012;104:19–34.
11. Faheem M, Khaliq S, Lone KP. Disruption of the reproductive axis in freshwater fish, catla, after bisphenol-A exposure. Zoolog Sci 2017;34:438–44.
12. de Lamirande E, Gagnon C. Impact of reactive oxygen species on spermatozoa: a balancing act between beneficial and detrimental effects. Hum Reprod 1995;10 Suppl 1:15–21.
13. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Lee JS, Kim J, Yoon SJ, Park YJ, et al. Sodium nitroprusside suppresses male fertility in vitro. Andrology 2014;2:899–909.
14. Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Nallella KP, Thomas AJ Jr, Alvarez JG, Sikka SC. Reactive oxygen species as an independent marker of male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2006;86:878–85.
15. Aitken RJ, Paterson M, Fisher H, Buckingham DW, van Duin M. Redox regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation in human spermatozoa and its role in the control of human sperm function. J Cell Sci 1995;108(Pt 5):2017–25.
16. Gassman NR. Induction of oxidative stress by bisphenol A and its pleiotropic effects. Environ Mol Mutagen 2017;58:60–71.
17. Takayanagi S, Tokunaga T, Liu X, Okada H, Matsushima A, Shimohigashi Y. Endocrine disruptor bisphenol A strongly binds to human estrogen-related receptor gamma (ERRgamma) with high constitutive activity. Toxicol Lett 2006;167:95–105.
18. Nadal A, Ropero AB, Laribi O, Maillet M, Fuentes E, Soria B. Nongenomic actions of estrogens and xenoestrogens by binding at a plasma membrane receptor unrelated to estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:11603–8.
19. Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC, Long M, Hofmeister MV, Vinggaard AM. Endocrine-disrupting potential of bisphenol A, bisphenol A dimethacrylate, 4-n-nonylphenol, and 4-n-octylphenol in vitro: new data and a brief review. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115 Suppl 1:69–76.
20. Zoeller RT, Bansal R, Parris C. Bisphenol-A, an environmental contaminant that acts as a thyroid hormone receptor antagonist in vitro, increases serum thyroxine, and alters RC3/neurogranin expression in the developing rat brain. Endocrinology 2005;146:607–12.
21. Naz RK, Sellamuthu R. Receptors in spermatozoa: are they real? J Androl 2006;27:627–36.
22. Heldring N, Pike A, Andersson S, Matthews J, Cheng G, Hartman J, et al. Estrogen receptors: how do they signal and what are their targets. Physiol Rev 2007;87:905–31.
23. Ptak A, Gregoraszczuk EL. Bisphenol A induces leptin receptor expression, creating more binding sites for leptin, and activates the JAK/Stat, MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signalling pathways in human ovarian cancer cell. Toxicol Lett 2012;210:332–7.
24. Ptak A, Rak-Mardyla A, Gregoraszczuk EL. Cooperation of bisphenol A and leptin in inhibition of caspase-3 expression and activity in OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2013;27:1937–43.
25. Wan X, Ru Y, Chu C, Ni Z, Zhou Y, Wang S, et al. Bisphenol A accelerates capacitation-associated protein tyrosine phosphorylation of rat sperm by activating protein kinase A. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2016;48:573–80.
26. Smith TB, Dun MD, Smith ND, Curry BJ, Connaughton HS, Aitken RJ. The presence of a truncated base excision repair pathway in human spermatozoa that is mediated by OGG1. J Cell Sci 2013;126(Pt 6):1488–97.
27. Kwon WS, Rahman MS, Lee JS, Kim J, Yoon SJ, Park YJ, et al. A comprehensive proteomic approach to identifying capacitation related proteins in boar spermatozoa. BMC Genomics 2014;15:897.
28. Rahman MS, Kwon WS, Pang MG. Prediction of male fertility using capacitation-associated proteins in spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev 2017;84:749–59.
29. Brohi RD, Huo LJ. Posttranslational modifications in spermatozoa and effects on male fertility and sperm viability. OMICS 2017;21:245–56.
30. Wang H, Ding Z, Shi QM, Ge X, Wang HX, Li MX, et al. Anti-androgenic mechanisms of Bisphenol A involve androgen receptor signaling pathway. Toxicology 2017;387:10–6.
31. Holdcraft RW, Braun RE. Hormonal regulation of spermatogenesis. Int J Androl 2004;27:335–42.
32. McLachlan RI, Wreford NG, Robertson DM, de Kretser DM. Hormonal control of spermatogenesis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1995;6:95–101.
33. Liang H, Xu W, Chen J, Shi H, Zhu J, Liu X, et al. The association between exposure to environmental bisphenol A and gonadotropic hormone levels among men. PLoS One 2017;12e0169217.
34. Romano ME, Webster GM, Vuong AM, Thomas Zoeller R, Chen A, Hoofnagle AN, et al. Gestational urinary bisphenol A and maternal and newborn thyroid hormone concentrations: the HOME Study. Environ Res 2015;138:453–60.
35. Krajewska-Kulak E, Sengupta P. Thyroid function in male infertility. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2013;4:174.
36. Manfo FP, Jubendradass R, Nantia EA, Moundipa PF, Mathur PP. Adverse effects of bisphenol A on male reproductive function. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 2014;228:57–82.
37. Liu C, Duan W, Li R, Xu S, Zhang L, Chen C, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A disrupts meiotic progression during spermatogenesis in adult rats through estrogen-like activity. Cell Death Dis 2013;4e676.
38. D’Souza R, Gill-Sharma MK, Pathak S, Kedia N, Kumar R, Balasinor N. Effect of high intratesticular estrogen on the seminiferous epithelium in adult male rats. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2005;241:41–8.
39. Hatef A, Alavi SM, Abdulfatah A, Fontaine P, Rodina M, Linhart O. Adverse effects of bisphenol A on reproductive physiology in male goldfish at environmentally relevant concentrations. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2012;76:56–62.
40. Hatef A, Zare A, Alavi SM, Habibi HR, Linhart O. Modulations in androgen and estrogen mediating genes and testicular response in male goldfish exposed to bisphenol A. Environ Toxicol Chem 2012;31:2069–77.
41. Williams C, Bondesson M, Krementsov DN, Teuscher C. Gestational bisphenol A exposure and testis development. Endocr Disruptors (Austin) 2014;2e29088.
42. Delbes G, Levacher C, Habert R. Estrogen effects on fetal and neonatal testicular development. Reproduction 2006;132:527–38.
43. Jefferson WN, Couse JF, Banks EP, Korach KS, Newbold RR. Expression of estrogen receptor beta is developmentally regulated in reproductive tissues of male and female mice. Biol Reprod 2000;62:310–7.
44. Asadi N, Bahmani M, Kheradmand A, Rafieian-Kopaei M. The impact of oxidative stress on testicular function and the role of antioxidants in improving it: a review. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:IE01–5.
45. Kaur S, Saluja M, Bansal MP. Bisphenol A induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in mice testes: modulation by selenium. Andrologia 2018;50
46. El-Beshbishy HA, Aly HA, El-Shafey M. Lipoic acid mitigates bisphenol A-induced testicular mitochondrial toxicity in rats. Toxicol Ind Health 2013;29:875–87.
47. Packer L, Witt EH, Tritschler HJ. Alpha-lipoic acid as a biological antioxidant. Free Radic Biol Med 1995;19:227–50.
48. Agarwal A, Virk G, Ong C, du Plessis SS. Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. World J Mens Health 2014;32:1–17.
49. Rando OJ. Daddy issues: paternal effects on phenotype. Cell 2012;151:702–8.
50. Skinner MK. Metabolic disorders: fathers’ nutritional legacy. Nature 2010;467:922–3.
51. Donkin I, Barres R. Sperm epigenetics and influence of environmental factors. Mol Metab 2018;14:1–11.
52. Manikkam M, Tracey R, Guerrero-Bosagna C, Skinner MK. Plastics derived endocrine disruptors (BPA, DEHP and DBP) induce epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of obesity, reproductive disease and sperm epimutations. PLoS One 2013;8e55387.
53. Manikkam M, Guerrero-Bosagna C, Tracey R, Haque MM, Skinner MK. Transgenerational actions of environmental compounds on reproductive disease and identification of epigenetic biomarkers of ancestral exposures. PLoS One 2012;7e31901.
54. Leung YK, Govindarajah V, Cheong A, Veevers J, Song D, Gear R, et al. Gestational high-fat diet and bisphenol A exposure heightens mammary cancer risk. Endocr Relat Cancer 2017;24:365–78.
55. Palmer NO, Bakos HW, Fullston T, Lane M. Impact of obesity on male fertility, sperm function and molecular composition. Spermatogenesis 2012;2:253–63.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Changes in spermatozoa following exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) in vitro. BPA may bind with either G protein-coupled receptors (GPR30) or estrogen receptors (ERs) located in the plasma membrane. BPA-mediated activation of these non-genomic receptors or increased stress caused by elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) in spermatozoa rapidly phosphorylates (P) mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), and protein kinase A (PKA). In addition, it causes phosphorylation of sperm proteins in tyrosine residues (Tyr-P). All these conditions are responsible for the modification of coregulatory function and subsequently predispose individuals to abnormal cellular outcomes.

Figure 2.

Interaction mechanism of bisphenol A (BPA) with estrogen receptors (ERs). A dynamic simulation demonstrating the interaction mechanism between BPA and a typical ERα. The atom coordinates of the complexes of ERα-BPA (PDB code: 3UU7, 2.2 Å) were obtained from the RCSB Protein Data Bank. As there were missing residues in 3UU7, Chimera 1.13 was used to add these missing residues in the loop regions. The added loops were refined through the loop refinement protocol. This structural analysis suggested that BPA could interact with the receptors on spermatozoa by mimicking the action of a natural hormone and keeping the ERs in an active conformation.

Figure 3.

Mechanisms of bisphenol A (BPA) action through the modification of estrogen receptors (ERs). Both genomic and non-genomic pathways have been highlighted in this figure. A detailed description of each pathway is given in the main text of the manuscript. GPR30, G protein-coupled receptors; mER, membrane-bound ER; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; cER, cytoplasmic ER; P, phosphorylation; TF, transcription factor; nER, nuclear ER.

Figure 4.

An outline of the distribution of estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) in the developing testis (A) and the possible mechanism of bisphenol A (BPA) action in testicular and germ cells in the developing (A) and adult testis (B). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have a major detrimental effect on testicular cells and on the growth and differentiation of germ cells, as mediated by developmental exposure to BPA. A detailed description of each step is provided in the main text.