 |
| CrossRef Text and Data Mining |
| Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining. |
| Reproductive Outcomes after Microsurgical Reversal of Tubal Sterilization in Women 36 Years Age or Older. |
| Seok Hyun Kim, Gyu Chang Lee, Soo Hee Choi, Young Min Choi, Chang Jae Shin, Jung Gu Kim, Shin Yong Moon, Jin Young Lee, Yoon Seok Chang |
| Clin Exp Reprod Med. 1998;25(3):341-348. Published online January 1, 2001 |
|
Reproductive outcome after tubal reversal in women 40 years of age or older Fertility and Sterility. 1996;65(4):863-865  MICROSURGICAL TUBAL REVERSAL AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC STERILIZATION Medical Journal of Australia. 1979;2(3):150-150 Factors affecting the reproductive outcome after microsurgical tubal ligation reversal Fertility and Sterility. 2002;78:S113 Microsurgical Reversal of Tubal Sterilization Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;12(4):457-463 Microsurgical Reversal of Female Sterilization: The Role of Tubal Length Fertility and Sterility. 1980;33(6):598-601 Factors affecting reproductive outcome after microsurgical tubal reversal The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. 2002;9(3):S24 Reversal of tubal sterilization versus IVF in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a clinical dilemma Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2007;15(4):403-407 MICROSURGICAL TUBAL ANASTOMOSIS FOR STERILIZATION REVERSAL Medical Journal of Australia. 1977;2(17):560-561 Restoring fertility after tubal ligation in women 40 years of age and older: How do we counsel our patients? Fertility and Sterility. 2020;113(4):733-734 Reversal of female sterilization: Comparison of microsurgical and gross surgical techniques for tubal anastomosis American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1981;139(1):73-79 |
